Semantic Information Orthogonal to Visual Features Peaks in LateralOccipitotemporal Cortex
Abstract
Language model embeddings of scene descriptions predict responses in the human higher visual cortex. However, a fundamental question remains: does this alignment reflect truly visually-independent semantic content, or does it occur because language models better mimic the complex visual features that drive these areas? We used 7T fMRI data from the Natural Scenes Dataset to directly address this by removing the influence of visual feature embeddings from language model embeddings, isolating semantic content that is separate from the visual signal. We then used these visually-independent embeddings to predict brain responses in individual voxels through cross-validated ridge regression. After adjusting for visual signals, we found a clear difference in brain regions: the lateral occipitotemporal cortex, especially in areas selective for body perception, showed significantly more visually-independent semantic variance compared to ventral stream regions. In contrast, the early visual cortex displayed notably negative predictions after adjustment, confirming that our method effectively removed visually-driven signals. This pattern was consistent across all eight subjects, both hemispheres, and six combinations of language models and visual feature architectures. These findings suggest that the lateral stream retains substantially more variance from language models unrelated to various visual feature models than the ventral stream does. This suggests that visually independent semantic coding is organized heterogenously along the occipital cortex. HighlightsO_LIBody-selective lateral occipitotemporal cortex (EBA) contains the strongest visually-independent semantic representations in human visual cortex. C_LIO_LIAfter removing visual feature variance, semantic encoding is significantly greater in lateral stream regions than in canonical ventral stream areas (FFA, PPA, RSC).The lateral-over-ventral dissociation is architecture-invariant, replicating across six combinations of language models (BERT, GPT-2, CLIP-text) and visual feature sets, with GPT-2 > BERT > CLIP-text ordering validating the pipeline. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High-level visual cortex representations are organized along visual rather than abstract principles.
Adva Shoham, Rotem Broday-Dvir, … Galit Yovel·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2024
- Linguistic Context Shapes Representations in the Human Visual Cortex
Shurui Li, Zheyu Jin, … Yuanning Li·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2025
- Cortical Representations of Concrete and Abstract Concepts in Language Combine Visual and Linguistic Representations
Jerry Tang, Amanda LeBel, Alexander G. Huth·bioRxiv·May 19, 2021
- Monkey See, Model Knew: Large Language Models Accurately Predict Visual Brain Responses in Humans AND Non-Human Primates
Colin Conwell, Emalie McMahon, … Leyla Işık·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2025
- Language-aligned models and structured scene descriptions reveal sensitivity to compositional scene structure in the high-level visual cortex
Karim Rajaei, Arian Afshar, … Hamid Soltanian-zadeh A·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2026
- Semantic reasoning takes place largely outside the language network
Anna Aleksandrovna Ivanova, Carina Kauf, … Evelina G. Fedorenko·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2025