Neuroscience LettersNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception
Abstract
Scalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) reflect a mixture of phase-locked activity across the auditory pathway. FFRs have been widely used as a neural barometer of complex listening skills, especially speech-in noise (SIN) perception. Applying individually optimized source reconstruction to speech-FFRs recorded via EEG (FFREEG), we assessed the relative contributions of subcortical [auditory nerve (AN), brainstem/midbrain (BS)] and cortical [bilateral primary auditory cortex, PAC] source generators with the aim of identifying which source(s) drive the brain-behavior relation between FFRs and SIN listening skills. We found FFR strength declined precipitously from AN to PAC, consistent with diminishing phase-locking along the ascending auditory neuroaxis. FFRs to the speech fundamental (F0) were robust to noise across sources, but were largest in subcortical sources (BS > AN > PAC). PAC FFRs were only weakly observed above the noise floor and only at the low pitch of speech (F0{approx}100 Hz). Brain-behavior regressions revealed (i) AN and BS FFRs were sufficient to describe listeners QuickSIN scores and (ii) contrary to neuromagnetic (MEG) FFRs, neither left nor right PAC FFREEG predicted SIN performance. Our preliminary findings suggest subcortical sources not only dominate the electrical FFR but also the link between speech-FFRs and SIN processing as observed in previous EEG studies.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 44
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deconstructing the Cortical Sources of Frequency Following Responses to Speech: A Cross-species Approach
G. Nike Gnanateja, Kyle Rupp, … Bharath Chandrasekaran·bioRxiv·May 17, 2021
- Auditory brainstem-cortical anatomy constrains the magnitude of frequency-following responses (FFRs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) coding speech-in-noise
Gavin M. Bidelman, Jack R. Stirn, … Hu Cheng·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2026
- Cortical correlates of the auditory frequency-following and onset responses: EEG and fMRI evidence
Emily BJ Coffey, Gabriella Musacchia, Robert J Zatorre·The Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2016
- No evidence of musical training influencing the cortical contribution to the speech-FFR and its modulation through selective attention
Jasmin Riegel, Alina Schüller, Tobias Reichenbach·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2024
- Early subcortical response at the fundamental frequency of continuous speech measured with MEG
Alina Schüller, Achim Schilling, … Tobias Reichenbach·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Attentional modulation of the cortical contribution to the frequency-following response evoked by continuous speech
Alina Schüller, Achim Schilling, … Tobias Reichenbach·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2023