Auditory brainstem-cortical anatomy constrains the magnitude of frequency-following responses (FFRs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) coding speech-in-noise
Gavin M. BidelmaniD, Jack R. Stirn, Rose RizziiD, Jessica A. MacLeaniD, Hu ChengiD
Abstract
Speech-evoked brain potentials provide a window into the neural encoding of speech, experience-dependent plasticity, and deficits in central auditory processing from communication disorders. Stronger and faster frequency-following responses (FFRs) and cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) have been interpreted as reflecting more robust and efficient auditory-sensory processing across brainstem and cortical levels. Importantly, these neural signatures relate to real-world listening skills like speech-in-noise (SIN) perception. Yet, how these speech-evoked FFRs/ERPs relate to underlying auditory anatomical structures is unknown. Using a multimodal imaging approach, we recorded FFRs and ERPs to clean and noise-degraded speech sounds to assess the strength of listeners neural encoding of speech at brainstem (FFR) and cortical (ERP) levels. MRI volumetrics of midbrain and transverse temporal gyrus (Heschls gyrus) quantified morphological variation in subcortical and cortical anatomy that underly these EEG potentials. The QuickSIN assessed behavioral SIN abilities. Results showed that larger and thicker right (but not left) Heschls gyrus was related to listeners SIN abilities as well as the size of their cortical ERPs. Structural and functional measures interacted at a subcortical level. For listeners with smaller midbrain volumes, larger speech FFRs were associated with better QuickSIN scores; whereas in individuals with larger midbrain volumes, larger FFRs were related to poorer QuickSIN. Our findings reveal common functional signatures of speech processing (FFRs, ERPs) are constrained by the anatomy of their underlying generators and suggest a complex interplay between auditory brain structure and function in accounting for perceptual SIN capacity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception
Gavin M. Bidelman, Sara Momtaz·Neuroscience LettersPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2021
- Neural correlates of early sound encoding and their relationship to speech in noise perception
Emily BJ Coffey, Alexander Chepesiuk, … Robert J Zatorre·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2016
- Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise
Caitlin N. Price, Gavin M. Bidelman·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2021
- Deconstructing the Cortical Sources of Frequency Following Responses to Speech: A Cross-species Approach
G. Nike Gnanateja, Kyle Rupp, … Bharath Chandrasekaran·bioRxiv·May 17, 2021
- Early subcortical response at the fundamental frequency of continuous speech measured with MEG
Alina Schüller, Achim Schilling, … Tobias Reichenbach·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Cortical correlates of the auditory frequency-following and onset responses: EEG and fMRI evidence
Emily BJ Coffey, Gabriella Musacchia, Robert J Zatorre·The Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2016