Nature CommunicationsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
DeMAG predicts the effects of variants in clinically actionable genes by integrating structural and evolutionary epistatic features
Federica LuppinoiD, Ivan A. AdzhubeiiD, Christopher A. CassaiD, Ágnes Tóth-PetróczyiD
Abstract
Despite an increasing use of genomic sequencing in clinical practice, interpretation of rare genetic variants remains challenging even in well-studied disease genes, resulting in many patients with Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUSs). Computational Variant Effect Predictors (VEPs) are currently used to provide valuable evidence in variant classifications, but they often misclassify benign variants, contributing to potential misdiagnoses. Here, we developed Deciphering Mutations in Actionable Genes (DeMAG), a supervised classifier for interpreting missense variants in actionable disease genes with improved performance over existing VEPs (20% decrease of false positive rate). Our tool has balanced specificity (82%) and sensitivity (94%) on clinical data, and the lowest misclassification rate on putatively benign variants among evaluated tools. DeMAG takes advantage of a novel epistatic feature, the partners score, which is based on evolutionary and structural partnerships of residues as estimated by evolutionary information and AlphaFold2 structural models. The partners score as a general framework of epistatic interactions, can integrate not only clinical but functional information. We anticipate that our tool (demag.org) will facilitate the interpretation of variants and improve clinical decision-making.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Variant effect predictor correlation with functional assays is reflective of clinical classification performance
Benjamin Livesey, Joseph A. Marsh·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2025
- Clinical evidence yield as a framework for evaluating computational predictors and multiplexed assays of variant effect
Yifei Shang, Mihaly Badonyi, Joseph A. Marsh·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2026
- Variant effect predictors are shaping the ClinVar classifications used to train and evaluate them
Minyu Tao, Joseph A. Marsh·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2026
- Updated benchmarking of variant effect predictors using deep mutational scanning
Benjamin Livesey, Joseph A. Marsh·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2023
- MAGI: Mechanistic Consequences of Genetic Variants via Genomic Foundation Models
Dan Ofer, Stav Zok, Michal Linial B·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2026
- Combining MAVEs and computational predictors improves variant classification across ancestries in hereditary cancer genes
Nikita Bora, Mihaly Badonyi, … Joanne Yuen Yie Ngeow·medRxiv·Dec 9, 2025