bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Virtual prototyping of non-invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation targeting upper limb motor function
Abdallah AlashqariD, Nabila BrihmatiD, Vincent GemariD, Zhaoshun HuiD, Seong-Ryong KohiD, Sandra Diaz-PieriD, Roberto M. de FreitasiD, Atsushi SasakiiD, Matija MiloseviciD, Rodolfo KeeseyiD, Ismael SeáñeziD, Esra NeufeldiD, Hélène CassoudesalleiD, Ursula S. HofstoetteriD, Karen MinassianiD, Fabien B. WagneriD, Andreas RowaldiD
Abstract
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) applied over the cervical or lumbar spinal cord facilitates motor function after paralysis. However, emerging electrophysiological evidence indicates mechanistic differences between cervical and lumbar tSCS and across different cervical tSCS paradigms. To clarify these discrepancies, we developed and validated a multi-scale, whole-body computational model of tSCS-induced volume conduction, axonal recruitment, and synaptic transmission. Across 24 cervical and four lumbar tSCS paradigms, simulations showed that somatosensory afferents consistently exhibit lower stimulation thresholds than motor efferents. In turn, region-specific synaptic transmission differences may explain electrophysiological discrepancies between cervical and lumbar tSCS. Across cervical tSCS paradigms, substantial volume conduction and axonal recruitment differences were observed that explain electrophysiological discrepancies. Specifically, clinically-prevalent paradigms, including those with anodes placed over the clavicles or iliac crests, engaged peripheral nerves in addition to spinal roots. This effect was amplified by multiphasic waveforms, which introduced recruitment sites near the anodes. By integrating simulations with electrophysiological recordings in 14 able-bodied individuals, we investigated previously unexplored cervical tSCS paradigms on their capacity to recruit somatosensory afferents relative to motor threshold.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Preferential activation of proprioceptive and cutaneous sensory fibers compared to motor fibers during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation: A computational study
Roberto M. de Freitas, Marco Capogrosso, … Matija Milosevic·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2022
- Neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
Natalie Phelps, Rodolfo Keesey, … Ismael Seáñez·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2026
- Enhanced selectivity of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation by multielectrode configuration
Noah K. Bryson, Lorenzo Lombardi, … Ismael Seáñez·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2023
- Fundamental limitations of kilohertz-frequency carriers in afferent fiber recruitment with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
Rodolfo Keesey, Ursula S. Hofstoetter, … Ismael Seáñez·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2024
- High-Frequency Stimulation Does Not Improve Comfort of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation
Ashley N Dalrymple, Charli Ann Hooper, … Douglas J. Weber·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2022
- Parameter-Dependent Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Neural Activation and Evoked Compound Action Potentials
Meagan K. Brucker-Hahn, Hans J. Zander, … Scott F. Lempka·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026