Neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
Natalie PhelpsiD, Rodolfo KeeseyiD, Rachel HawthorniD, C. Scott AtkinsoniD, Ismael SeáñeziD
Abstract
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) of the cervical spinal cord has been thought to modulate lumbar networks, leading to the hypothesis that leg muscle recruitment may occur via recruitment of long-range spinal connections between cervical and lumbar circuits. To directly test this hypothesis, we compared arm and leg muscle responses elicited in unimpaired participants (N = 12) by cervical tSCS with the anodes placed over the iliac crests, with the anodes placed over the clavicles, and with lumbar tSCS as a control for leg muscle recruitment via the posterior root-muscle reflex. The idea of tSCS targeting cervico-lumbar connectivity would suggest that cervical stimulation could evoke responses in leg muscles. However, in our experiments, leg responses via cervical tSCS were only observed when the anodes were placed over the iliac crests, but not over the clavicles. These leg muscle responses had shorter latencies than those with lumbar tSCS and showed minimal post-activation depression, indicating efferent rather than afferent recruitment. Therefore, changes in leg muscle excitability by cervical-iliac tSCS previously attributed to descending cervical circuits could instead be explained by direct recruitment of efferent fibers near the iliac anodes. These findings suggest that cervical tSCS alone does not engage leg muscle motoneurons via long-range spinal or bidirectional pathways. Therefore, our study highlights the need to carefully consider electrode configuration when interpreting cervical tSCS mechanisms and additional or unexpected rehabilitative effects that extend caudally from the cervical spinal cord.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Virtual prototyping of non-invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation targeting upper limb motor function
Abdallah Alashqar, Nabila Brihmat, … Andreas Rowald·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2026
- Enhanced selectivity of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation by multielectrode configuration
Noah K. Bryson, Lorenzo Lombardi, … Ismael Seáñez·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2023
- Preferential activation of proprioceptive and cutaneous sensory fibers compared to motor fibers during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation: A computational study
Roberto M. de Freitas, Marco Capogrosso, … Matija Milosevic·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2022
- Intraoperative electrical stimulation of the human dorsal spinal cord reveals a map of arm and hand muscle responses
James R. McIntosh, Evan F. Joiner, … Jason B. Carmel·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2022
- Spatiotemporal spinal integration of descending and spinal volleys in spinal motor circuits revealed by compound motor evoked potentials
Yousuke Tanaka, Atsushi Sasaki, … Kimitaka Nakazawa·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2026
- A NEW POSTURAL MOTOR RESPONSE TO SPINAL CORD STIMULATION: POST-STIMULATION REBOUND EXTENSION
Amr A. Mahrous, Matthieu K. Chardon, … Charles J. Heckman·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2024