Within-Trial Noise Accounts for Inhibition of Return
Tal Seidel MalkinsoniD, Alexia BourgeoisiD, Nicolas WattieziD, Ana B. ChicaiD, Pierre PougetiD, Paolo BartolomeoiD
Abstract
Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of response times (RTs) for stimuli presented at previously inspected locations relative to novel locations. However, the exact processing stage(s) at which IOR occurs, and its nature across different response modalities, remain debated. By reanalyzing RT data from a target-target IOR paradigm with a single noisy accumulator model, we tested whether IOR could occur at sensory or attentional stages of processing, or at later stages of decision and action selection. We considered IOR under two conditions: manual and saccadic responses. The within-trial Gaussian noise parameter best explained both manual and saccadic IOR, suggesting that in both modalities, IOR may result from a more fluctuating accumulation of evidence for repeated locations. These results support the hypothesis that target-target IOR may primarily involve attentional-level mechanisms. Significance statementWe respond more slowly to a stimulus that is presented within a short interval in the same location ("inhibition of return"), a bias thought to promote efficient visual exploration. Using evidence-accumulation modeling of manual and eye-movement reaction times from two previous studies, we found that the key change linked to inhibition of return is greater within-trial variability (noise) in evidence accumulation, not a higher decision threshold. Understanding which processing stage is affected can help connect behavioral effects to the brain networks that support attention and orienting.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evidence Accumulation Modelling Reveals that Gaussian Noise Accounts for Inhibition of Return
Tal Seidel Malkinson, Alexia Bourgeois, … Paolo Bartolomeo·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2020
- Learning what is irrelevant or relevant: Expectations facilitate distractor inhibition and target facilitation through distinct neural mechanisms
Dirk van Moorselaar, Heleen A. Slagter·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2019
- Fronto-parietal Organization for Response Times in Inhibition of Return: The FORTIOR Model
Tal Seidel Malkinson, Paolo Bartolomeo·CortexPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2017
- Distractor inhibition contributes to retroactive attentional orienting within working memory: Evidence by lateralized alpha oscillations in the EEG
Daniel Schneider, Anna Barth, … Edmund Wascher·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2018
- Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
Anna C. Geuzebroek, Hannah Craddock, … Simon P. Kelly·eLifePeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2023
- Attention rhythmically shapes sensory tuning
Laurie Galas, Ian Donovan, Laura Dugué·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2025