Tal Seidel Malkinson

The paper reanalyzes reaction time data using a noisy accumulator model to determine if inhibition of return occurs at sensory, attentional, or decision stages, finding that within-trial noise explains both manual and saccadic IOR.

The paper analyzes intracortical recordings to show exogenous attention emerges as cortical gradients, with neural activity reflecting visual attributes and response timing.

The paper uses intracerebral recordings and modeling to show how fronto-parietal networks mediate attention and consciousness in human perception.

This study uses MEG to investigate how attentional cues affect conscious visual perception, finding that predictive cues enhance detection while invalid cues disrupt processing.

The paper shows that a top-down prior stabilizes size perception across the visual field by demonstrating an Ebbinghaus illusion effect that reverses in the periphery and normalizes with repeated viewing.

The paper uses evidence accumulation modeling to show that Gaussian noise explains IOR in both manual and saccadic response modalities.

The paper introduces FORTIOR, a model of cortical control of visual IOR in the human brain, based on fronto-parietal network asymmetries and explains IOR patterns and dissociations between manual and saccadic responses.

The paper demonstrates pseudoneglect in visual search and shows that simulated neurorobots with specific hemispheric asymmetries and inter-hemispheric inhibition replicate this behavior.