Wildlife movement and contact responses to intensive culling: implications for disease control
Kayleigh ChalkowskiiD, Nathan P. SnowiD, Abigail B. FeukaiD, Bruce R. Leland, Kurt C. VerCautereniD, Ryan S. MilleriD, Kim M. PepiniD
Abstract
Culling is frequently used to control animal diseases. Intensive culling can alter the movement behavior of surviving animals, especially in socially-structured wildlife species. These behavioral responses could have unexpected consequences on the spread of a disease. Thus, planning effective culling responses to diseases in wildlife hosts requires a thorough understanding of the potential impacts of culling on the target wildlife host species. We conducted a BACI design study of behavioral response to culling in wild pigs. We examined movement and contact responses in the populations using 122 GPS-collared wild pigs and three different culling methods (aerial operations, trapping, and an experimental toxic bait). Movement and contact metrics included home range area, net-squared displacement (i.e., home range shift), movement speed, distance, contact degree and contact duration. We observed increased movement distances during and after trapping treatments, and home range shifts and reduced area size after the toxicant treatment. We also observed increases in contact duration and number of unique contacts during trapping removals. Movement and contact responses varied by sex. Our results suggest that continued, intensive culling as with extensive trapping can substantially alter wild pig space use and contact. These behavioral responses could have important consequences for disease spread when managing an introduction of transboundary animal diseases or endemic diseases.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neglecting movement-disease feedback biases wildlife epidemic forecasts
Yun Tao, Rodrigo Campos, … Liliana C. M. Salvador·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2026
- Collateral effects of lethal management operations: biologging reveals multiscale responses in non-target vervet monkeys
Loïc Brun, Josefien A. Tankink, Erica van de Waal·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2026
- Quantifying Feral Pig Interactions to Inform Disease Transmission Networks
Tatiana Proboste, Abigail Turnlund, … Ricardo J. Soares Magalhães·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 6, 2025
- Comparing efficiencies of population control methods for responding to foreign animal disease threats in wild pigs
Nathan P. Snow, Benjamin Smith, … Kim M. Pepin·Preventive Veterinary MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2024
- Operational lessons learned from simulating an elimination response to a transboundary animal disease in wild animals
Kayleigh Chalkowski, Kim M. Pepin, … N. P. Snow·Preventive Veterinary MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2024
- Quantifying Spatio-Temporal Overlap of Invasive Wild Pigs and Domestic Pig Farms as a Proxy for Potential Disease Transmission Risk
R. K. Brook, R. Aschim·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2022