bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
FLAG: Find, Label Annotate Genomes, a fully automated tool for genome gene structural and functional annotation of highly fragmented non-model species
William TroyiD, Joana DamasiD, Alexander TitusiD, Brandi L. CantareliD
Abstract
Recent advances in long-read sequencing technologies and the efforts of projects aimed at increasing the universe of sequenced reference genomes have led to a growth in the number of whole genomes sequenced for non-model organisms. Still, 81% of the over 36,000 unique publicly available eukaryotic genomes in the NCBI database lack gene structure annotations (1). While there are many open-source tools available for each step in the annotation process, many of these tools are designed for chromosomal assemblies with available transcript data from the same or very closely related organisms. Here we present "Find, Label, Annotate Genomes" (FLAG), a fully automated genome annotation workflow. FLAG (i) works on any computing environment, (ii) runs automatically without initial training data, (iii) generates structural and functional annotations, (iv) performs accurately with fragmented genomes, (v) does not require species-specific extrinsic evidence (transcript sequences) and (vi) includes quality control steps to evaluate annotation completeness. We compared the gene annotations generated by FLAG and publicly available annotations from 12 eukaryotic organisms, including 1 plant, 8 living animals, and 1 extinct animal. In fragmented genomes, FLAG annotations provided an average of 18% increase in complete BUSCO scores and 15x lower error rate for the predicted number of protein-coding genes when compared to published BRAKER2 annotations. With FLAG-Refiner further improved results by decreasing the error rate to 17x lower when compared to published BRAKER2 annotations. In high-quality model organisms, FLAG demonstrates comparable results to those of the NCBI EGAP pipeline, underscoring its robustness and accuracy in gene prediction across diverse taxa and assembly qualities.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- OMAnnotator: a novel approach to building an annotated consensus genome sequence
Sadé Bates, Christophe Dessimoz, Yannis Nevers·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Welcome to the big leaves: best practices for improving genome annotation in non-model plant genomes
Vidya S Vuruputoor, Daniel L. Monyak, … Jill Wegrzyn·Applications in Plant SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023
- OrthoFiller: utilising data from multiple species to improve the completeness of genome annotations.
Michael P. Dunne, Steven L. Kelly·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2017
- FINDER: An automated software package to annotate eukaryotic genes from RNA-Seq data and associated protein sequences
Sagnik Banerjee, Priyanka Bhandary, … Carson M. Andorf·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2021
- Building better genome annotations across the tree of life
Adam H. Freedman, Timothy B. Sackton·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- BRAKER3: Fully Automated Genome Annotation Using RNA-Seq and Protein Evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS and TSEBRA
Lars Gabriel, Tomáš Brůna, … Mario Stanke·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024