Acoustic features of emotional vocalisations account for early modulations of event-related brain potentials
Abstract
Emotion is key to human communication, inferring emotion in a speakers voice is a cross-cultural and cross-linguistic capability. Electroencephalography (EEG) studies of neural mechanisms supporting emotion perception have reported that early components of the event-related potential (ERP) are modulated by emotion. However, the nature of emotions effect, especially on the P200 component, is disputed. We hypothesised that early acoustic features of emotional utterances might account for ERP modulations previously attributed to emotion. We recorded multi-channel EEG from healthy participants (n = 30) tasked with recognising the emotion of utterances. We used fifty vocalisations in five emotions - anger, happiness, neutral, sadness and pleasure - drawn from the Montreal Affective Voices dataset. We statistically quantified instantaneous associations between ERP amplitudes, emotion categories, and acoustic features, specifically, intensity, pitch, first formant, and second formant. We found that shortly after utterance onset (120-250 ms, i.e., P200, early P300) ERP amplitude for sad vocalisations was less than for other emotional categories. Moreover, ERP amplitude at around 180 ms for happy vocalisation was less than for anger, sadness, and pleasure. Our analysis showed that acoustic intensity explains most of these early-latency effects. We also found that, at longer latency (220-500 ms; late P200, P300) ERP amplitude for neutral vocalisations was less than for other emotional categories. Furthermore, there were also ERP differences between anger and happiness, anger and pleasure, anger and sadness, happiness and pleasure, as well as happiness and sadness in shorter windows during this late period. Acoustic pitch and, to a lesser degree, acoustic intensity explain most of these later effects. We conclude that acoustic features can account for early ERP modulations evoked by emotional utterances. Because previous studies used a variety of stimuli, our result likely resolves previous disputes on emotions effect on P200.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural dynamics of induced throat vibrations during vocal emotion recognition
Damien Benis, Garance Selosse, … Léonardo Ceravolo·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2025
- Common neural bases for processing speech prosody and music: An integrated model
Alice Mado Proverbio, Elisabetta Piotti·Psychology of MusicPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2021
- Modulation of early level EEG signatures by distributed facial emotion cues
Diana Costa, Camila Dias, … Miguel S. Castelo-Branco·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2021
- Automatic brain categorization of discrete auditory emotion expressions
Siddharth Talwar, Francesca M. Barbero, … Olivier Collignon·Brain TopographyPeer-reviewed·Aug 28, 2023
- Associated valence impacts early visual processing of letter strings: Evidence from ERPs in a cross-modal learning paradigm
Mareike Bayer, Annika Graß, Annekathrin Schacht·Cognitive Affective & Behavioral NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 19, 2018
- Examining the Central Auditory Processing Using a Multi-Feature ERP Paradigm to Phonetic, Prosodic and Acoustic Features
Maria Ioanna Zavogianni, Maja Kelić, Ferenc Honbolygó·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2024