Chirped Speech (Cheech) Enables Rapid Assessment of Multi-Level Auditory Evoked Potentials During Speech-in-Noise Recognition
May Chao, C. Alise Holloway, Lee M. MilleriD, Kelsey MankeliD
Abstract
Difficulties understanding speech in noise remain a common complaint even among listeners with normal hearing sensitivity, highlighting the need for objective, more effective measures of real-world listening. The goal of this study was to validate the use of a novel, chirped-speech (Cheech) stimulus - continuous, naturally-spoken speech fused with chirps designed to elicit robust auditory evoked potentials - to characterize relationships between speech recognition, listening effort, and auditory neural encoding. Twenty-five normal-hearing adults completed a sentence-recognition task using both original (unmodified) and Cheech-modified AzBio sentence lists in quiet, +3 dB, and -3 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions while neural responses from the brainstem through cortex were recorded simultaneously. Speech recognition remained near ceiling in quiet but declined with decreasing SNR for both original and Cheech stimuli. Compared with clean speech, Cheech-modified speech showed slightly poorer recognition performance as SNR decreased and somewhat higher perceived effort overall. Yet, Cheech was highly effective at evoking auditory responses from the brainstem (auditory brainstem response, ABR) through the cortex (including middle- and late-latency responses, MLR and LLR) even with <5 minutes listening time per condition. Neural responses showed reduced amplitudes and prolonged latencies as SNR decreased. In general, ABR latencies and wave I amplitudes were associated with speech-in-noise recognition performance, whereas cortical responses (MLR Na, Nb, and LLR P1) were associated with subjective workload. These findings show that Cheech-modified speech preserves intelligibility while yielding robust, multilevel neural recordings during sentence perception, offering a promising approach to examine hierarchical auditory processing under ecologically relevant speech-in-noise conditions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Auditory brainstem responses to speech-in-noise reflect selective attention, comprehension, and subjective listening effort
Kelsey Mankel, Daniel C. Comstock, … Lee M. Miller·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2026
- Individual Differences in Cognition and Perception Predict Neural Processing of Speech in Noise for Audiometrically Normal Listeners.
Sana Shehabi, Daniel C. Comstock, … Lee M. Miller·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2025
- The effect of stimulus choice on an EEG-based objective measure of speech intelligibility
Eline Verschueren, Jonas Vanthornhout, Tom Francart·Ear and HearingPeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2020
- Neural responses to movie naturalistic stimuli are related to listening demand in cochlear implant users
Bowen Xiu, Brandon T. Paul, … Andrew Dimitrijevic·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2022
- Neural correlates of individual differences in speech-in-noise performance in a large cohort of cochlear implant users
Joel Isaac Berger, Phillip E. Gander, … Inyong Choi·Ear and HearingPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2023
- Automatic Auditory Streaming Restores Missing Temporal Modulations in Echoic Speech
Jiaxin Gao, Mingxuan Fang, … Nai Ding·bioRxiv·May 11, 2023