Fit by design: Developing substrate-specific seed mixtures for functional dike grasslands
Abstract
O_LISowing is a well-established restoration technique to overcome dispersal limitation. Site-specific seed mixtures are most effective to achieve functional communities. This is especially important if the restored vegetation has to protect critical infrastructure like roadsides and dikes. Here, an improved seed-substrate combination will secure slope stability, reduce mowing efforts, and generate species-rich grasslands. C_LIO_LIA factorial field experiment addressed this topic on a dike at River Danube in SE Germany in 2018-2021. Within 288 plots, we tested three sand admixtures, two substrate depths, two seed densities and two seed mixture types (mesic hay meadow, semi-dry calcareous grassland) in north and south exposition, and measured the recovery completeness by calculating the successional distance to reference sites, the persistence of sown species, and the Favourable Conservation Status (FCS) of target species. C_LIO_LIOverall, the sown vegetation developed in the desired direction, but a recovery debt remained after four years, and some plots still showed similarities to negative references from ruderal sites. In north exposition, hay meadow-seed mixtures developed closer to the respective reference communities than dry-grassland mixtures. C_LIO_LIIn south exposition, the sown communities developed poorly which might be due to a severe drought during establishment. This initial negative effect remained over the entire observation period. C_LIO_LISand admixture had a slightly positive effect on target variables, while substrate depth, seed density and mixture type had no effects on species persistence or FCS. C_LIO_LISynthesis and applications: Site-adapted seed mixtures make restoration more effective. However, applying several seed-substrate combinations might foster beta diversity. Furthermore, additional management efforts are recommended, as they might be necessary to reduce the recovery debt, as well as re-sowing after unfavourable conditions. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Vegetation and seed bank dynamics highlight the importance of post-restoration management in sown grasslands
O. Valko, B. Deak, … B. Tothmeresz·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2020
- Seed sourcing for climate-resilient grasslands: the role of seed source diversity during early restoration establishment
J. Lindstrom, M. Ahlering, J. Hamilton·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2021
- Establishment gaps in species-poor grasslands: artificial biodiversity hotspots to support the colonization of target species
- Dark diversity reveals assembly constraints across trophic levels in large-scale grassland restoration
Qingqing Chen, Laura Forgione, … Jean‐Yves Humbert·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2026
- Hungarian Grey cattle grazing outperforms mowing during wet meadow restoration following plantation forest clear-cut
- Divergent impact of grazing on plant communities of created wetlands with varying hydrology and antecedent land use
K. A. Lodge, A. C. Tyler·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2020