Classical and controlled auditory mismatch responses to multiple physical deviances in anaesthetised and conscious mice
Abstract
Human mismatch negativity (MMN) is modelled in rodents and other non-human species to examine its underlying neurological mechanisms, primarily described in terms of deviance-detection and adaptation. Using the mouse model, we aim to elucidate subtle dependencies between the mismatch response (MMR) and different physical properties of sound. Epidural field potentials were recorded from urethane-anaesthetised and conscious mice during oddball and many-standards control paradigms; with stimuli varying in duration, frequency, intensity, and inter-stimulus interval. Resulting auditory evoked potentials, classical MMR (oddball - standard), and controlled MMR (oddball - control) waveforms were analysed. Stimulus duration correlated with stimulus-off response peak latency (p < 0.0001). Frequency (p < 0.0001), intensity (p < 0.0001), and inter-stimulus interval (p < 0.0001) correlated with stimulu-son N1 and P1 (conscious only) peak amplitudes. These relationships were instrumental in shaping classical MMR morphology in both anaesthetised and conscious animals, suggesting these waveforms reflect modification of normal auditory processing by different physical properties of stimuli. Controlled MMR waveforms appeared to exhibit habituation to auditory stimulation over time, which was equally observed in response to oddball and standard stimuli. These observations are not consistent with the mechanisms thought to underlie human MMN, which currently do not address differences due to specific physical features of auditory deviance. Thus, no evidence was found to objectively support the deviance-detection or adaptation hypotheses of MMN in relation to anaesthetised or conscious mice.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 19
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Auditory evoked potentials to changes in speech sound duration in anesthetized mice
Arto Lipponen, Jari L. O. Kurkela, … Piia Astikainen·bioRxiv·May 24, 2018
- More evidence for a long-latency mismatch response in urethane-anaesthetised mice
Jamie A. O’Reilly, Thanate Angsuwatanakul·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2021
- Mismatch responses mediated by adaptation and deviance detection have complementary functional profiles that point to different auditory short-term memory systems
Tobias Teichert, Hank Peter Jedema, … Kate Gurnsey·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2019
- Neurophysiology of mismatch negativity generation: a biophysical modeling study
Carolina Fernandez Pujol, Joshua Bruce, … Andrew R. Dykstra·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2025
- Do auditory mismatch responses differ between acoustic features?
HyunJung An, Shing Ho Kei, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 31, 2021
- A comparison of auditory oddball responses in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala and auditory cortex of macaque
Corrie R. Camalier, Kaylee C. Scarim, … Bruno B. Averbeck·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2019