Theory of interaction between untuned modulatory inputs and tuned sensory inputs
Abstract
How does the brain integrate sensory inputs with non-feature-tuned signals, such as those arising from behavioral state changes or neuromodulation? Here, we show that the dynamics of disordered E/I networks with structured, feature-dependent connectivity can be well characterized by an effective model describing interactions between the responses of cells who prefer the current sensory stimulus ("matched" cells) and the responses of cells firing at the baseline. This effective network exhibits strong feedback from the baseline onto the matched responses but weak reverse projections. Thus, an untuned stimulus not only directly drives matched cells, but also indirectly drives them via modulation of the baseline. We demonstrate through a linear response analysis that the baseline effect on the matched response is suppressive if the network is strongly coupled and feedback-inhibition dominated. In particular, in this regime, feature-dependent networks produce "rate reshuffling", wherein untuned optogenetic excitation yields large changes in the individual responses of matched cells without significantly changing their overall firing rate distribution, as the optogenetically-induced baseline response suppresses the matched response. Finally, if multiple sensory stimuli are presented, yielding sublinear response summation ("normalization"), the influence of the baseline on the matched responses is weakened. Thus, an untuned (e.g., optogenetic) stimulus is less suppressive to multiple stimuli than to a single stimulus, making normalization effectively weaker in the presence of an untuned stimulus. Our framework provides the first theory of the interaction of untuned modulatory and tuned sensory inputs, reconciles prior experiments, and provides testable predictions about tuned-untuned interactions in cortical processing. Significance StatementSensory cortex receives both tuned sensory inputs, and untuned signals e.g. from global stimulus changes, behavioral state changes, or neuromodulation. We lack a theory of how these inputs are integrated. We demonstrate reduction of circuit models to a model of interactions between baseline and sensory-stimulus-matched responses, and develop an exact linear response analysis of activity perturbation by untuned inputs. We show baseline-to-matched coupling is strong, while matched-to-baseline is weak, and the former is suppressive given sufficiently strong and inhibition-dominated connectivity. We extend the theory to multiple tuned stimuli. The theory offers a mechanistic explanation of previous surprising observations ("rate reshuffling"), yields new predictions, and provides a general framework for understanding the impact of modulatory influences on sensory processing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Context-specific modulation of intrinsic coupling modes shapes multisensory processing
Edgar E. Galindo-Leon, Iain Stitt, … Andreas Karl Engel·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Apr 5, 2019
- Characterizing and interpreting the influence of internal variables on sensory activity
Richard D. Lange, Ralf M. Haefner·Current Opinion in NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2017
- The Role of Untuned Neurons In Sensory Information Coding
Joel Zylberberg·bioRxiv·May 30, 2018
- Reliable sensory processing of superficial cortical interneurons is modulated by behavioral state
Carolyn G. Sweeney, Maryse E. Thomas, … Anne E. Takesian·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Subunit-specific behavioral modulation of sensory tuning in the visual cortex
Julia M. Mayer, Wiktor F. Młynarski·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2026
- Computing the effects of excitatory-inhibitory balance on neuronal input-output properties
Alex D. Reyes·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2026