bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
The Temporal Profile of Dual-task Interference in the Human Brain
Seyed-Reza HashemiradiD, Maryam Vaziri-PashkamiD, Mojtaba AbbaszadehiD
Abstract
Due to the brains limited cognitive capacity, simultaneous execution of multiple tasks can lead to performance impairments, mainly when the tasks occur closely in time. This limitation is known as dual-task interference. We aimed to investigate the time course of this phenomenon in the brain, utilizing a combination of EEG, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), and drift-diffusion modeling (DDM). Here, participants first performed a tone discrimination task, followed by a lane-change task with either short or long onset time differences (Stimulus Onset Asynchrony, SOA), in a simulated driving environment. As expected, the dual-task interference increased the second tasks (lane-change) reaction time. The DDM analysis indicated that this increase was attributable to changes in both the decision time and the post-decision time. Our MVPA findings revealed a decrease in decoding accuracy for the lane-change task in short SOA compared to both long SOA and single-task conditions throughout the trial, highlighting the presence of interference. Moreover, the temporal generalization analysis identified a significant interference effect in short SOA compared to long SOA and single-task conditions after [~]250 ms relative to stimulus onset. Additionally, the conditional generalization analysis showed a delayed response after [~]450 ms. Searchlight analysis illustrated the progression of this information reduction, starting in occipital, parietal, and parieto-occipital leads responsible for perceptual and central processing and then transferring to the frontal leads for mapping decisions onto motor actions. Consistent with the hybrid dual-task interference theory, our results suggest that the processing of the two tasks occurs in a partial parallel manner for the first few hundred milliseconds and primarily in the perceptual and decision-processing stages. Subsequently, another competition arises between the two tasks to route information to motor areas for execution, resulting in the second tasks serial processing and delay or lengthening.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dual-task Interference in a Simulated Driving Environment: Serial or Parallel Processing?
Mojtaba Abbaszadeh, Gholam‐Ali Hossein‐Zadeh, Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam·Frontiers in PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2021
- Trial-Level Sequence Modeling Reveals Hidden Dynamics of Dual-Task Interference
Rick den Otter, Anna Dame, … Leendert van Maanen·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2026
- Disturbance of Information in Superior Parietal Lobe during Dual-task Interference in a Simulated Driving Task
Mojtaba Abbaszadeh, Gholam‐Ali Hossein‐Zadeh, … Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam·CortexPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2023
- THE DUAL-TASK COST IS DUE TO NEURAL INTERFERENCES DISRUPTING THE OPTIMAL SPATIO-TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF THE COMPETING TASKS
Diego Mac-Auliffe, Benoît Chatard, … J.-P. Lachaux·Frontiers in Behavioral NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2021
- Adaptive rescheduling of error monitoring in multitasking
Robert Steinhauser, Marco Steinhauser·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2021
- Patterns of information segregation during working memory and attention revealed by dual-task interference in behavior, pupillometry, and EEG
Justin T. Fleming, J. Michelle Njoroge, … Barbara G. Shinn‐Cunningham·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2021