bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint
Impact of sequencing approach on ecological inference from highly variable bat gut microbiomes
Ostaizka AizpuruaiD, Evie Morris, Lasse NyholmiD, Raphael EisenhoferiD, Carmi KorineiD, Amy Gladwell, Orly RazgouriD, Antton AlberdiiD
- Citations
- 1
Abstract
Understanding the functional potential of animal gut microbiomes requires analytical approaches that can accurately capture both taxonomic and functional diversity, particularly in hosts with samples with low and variable microbial DNA fractions, such as bats. Here, we compared 16S amplicon sequencing and genome-resolved metagenomics for characterising the gut microbiomes of three sympatric insectivorous bats (Pipistrellus kuhlii, Hypsugo ariel, and Cnephaeus bottae). Amplicon sequencing recovered 3,536 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) spanning 29 microbial phyla, including five archaeal groups, while metagenomics yielded 135 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) across 15 bacterial phyla. Alpha and beta diversity patterns differed significantly between approaches. Applying prevalence- and abundance-based filtering to amplicon data improved alpha diversity congruence with metagenomic profiles, indicating that low-abundance and rare ASVs inflate diversity estimates, while the low microbial DNA fractions in bat faeces challenge genome reconstruction of such taxa. Functional reconstructions diverged notably, with metagenomics-based functional profiles yielding consistently lower metabolic capacities than those indirectly inferred from 16S amplicon sequencing, both before and after prevalence- and abundance-based filtering, due to incompleteness of many reconstructed genomes. However, metagenome-assembled genomes harboured metabolic capacities missed by the indirect functional inference of metabarcoding, which largely rely on genomes of strains characterised in model organisms. Together, these findings highlight the influence of chosen methodology, host species, and data filtering on microbiome profiling in taxa with low microbial biomass. We propose practical guidelines to improve analytical consistency and reliability when studying gut microbiomes of bats and other hosts with similarly variable microbial communities.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Anthropogenic habitats shape gut microbiome composition in Southern Indian bats
Vikram Iyer, B. R. Ansil, … Balaji Chattopadhyay·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2025
- A new tool in a toolbox: Addressing challenges in high-throughput microbiota surveys across diverse wild insects
Mateusz Buczek, Michał R. Kolasa, … Piotr Łukasik·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2024
- Microbiome stability in wild and rehabilitated insectivorous bats revealed by shotgun metagenomics
Dongsheng Luo, Alise Jany Ponsero, … Efstathios S. Giotis·MicroorganismsPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2026
- Evaluating bacterial and functional diversity of human gut microbiota by complementary metagenomics and metatranscriptomics
R. Ranjan, A. Rani, … D. L. Perkins·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2018
- Cryptic Insect Microbiome Compositions Unveiled with Full-Length 16S Sequencing
Charles J. Mason, Thorsten E. Hansen, … Scott M. Geib·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2026
- Host species identity shapes the diversity and structure of insect microbiota
A. Malacrino'·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2021