Challenges and opportunities in detecting leaf water and carotenoid content across biomes from satellite multispectral indices
Martha Graciela Montes-BojorqueziD, Carlos A. Robles‐ZazuetaiD, Clara Tinoco‐OjangureniD, Brian Joseph EnquistiD, Amy E. FrazieriD, Brian MaitneriD, Gabriel Massaine MOULATLETiD, José Raúl Romo-LeóniD, Lei SongiD, César Hinojo‐HinojoiD
Abstract
Climate change is causing vegetation stress across the globe, increasing the need for reliable indicators to monitor plant health. Leaf water and carotenoid content, and the chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio, are established proxies for environmental stress that can be detected by remote sensing. Here, we evaluated the sensitivity of 11 multispectral vegetation indices (VIs) designed to monitor these three stress-related leaf traits across a broad range of environmental and vegetation conditions. For this, we combined radiative transfer modeling with cross-biome field and satellite observations from Sentinel-2, Landsat 8, and MODIS from the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), spanning in most major terrestrial ecosystems. Our model-based analysis showed that VIs have a low to moderate sensitivity to their target traits, ranging from water indices with 66% of their variability explained by leaf water content, to carotenoid indices with 27% variability explained by leaf carotenoid content. Surprisingly, our field-based analyses revealed minimal to no sensitivity to leaf water and carotenoid content and chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio across all VIs. In contrast, we showed that leaf area index was the dominant driver of all studied VIs, accounting for 54-74 % of their variability in the field-based analysis. Lastly, we detected that VI[s] sensitivity to atmospheric conditions and field sampling issues contribute to their low performance in validating ground truth observations. These findings show that improvements in the VIs formulation and field sampling strategies are needed to increase the reliability of vegetation stress monitoring from multispectral satellites and support a generalized use of VIs across ecosystems. Highlights: 3-5 bullet points, 85 characters[bullet] Sensitivity of water and carotenoid multispectral indices was evaluated [bullet]Analysis based on cross-biome field data and radiative transfer models [bullet]Field data showed indices had minimal sensitivity to leaf water and carotenoid [bullet]Leaf area index explained most cross-biome variation in water and carotenoid indices [bullet]We propose strategies to improve stress-related index formulation and validation
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Automated Hyperspectral Vegetation Index Derivation Using A Hyperparameter Optimization Framework for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping
J. Koh, B. Banerjee, … S. Kant·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2021
- What do satellite vegetation indices actually measure? Photosynthetic capacity rather than transient physiological function across 328 global FLUXNET sites
Yiran Zhang, Xuanlong Ma, … Chunyan Cao·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026
- Spectral estimation of in-vivo wheat chlorophyll a/b ratio under contrasting water availabilities
G. Mulero, H. Bacher, … I. Herrmann·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2021
- Characterizing the Responses of Camelina and Sorghum to Environmental Stress through a Multi-Modal Approach
Kati A. Seitz, Demosthenes Morales, … James H. Werner·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2024
- The Fallacy and Bias of Averages on Vegetation Indices based Plant Phenotyping
C.H. Lee, Chih-Chen Tseng, … Tsu‐Wei Chen·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2025
- Predicting plant-related and leaf-related parameters of winter wheat using vegetation index: Should phenological correction be applied across growth stages?