A core genetic mechanism integrates growth hormone signals to control meristem fate and inflorescence architecture in setaria and maize
Jaspreet SandhuiD, Jiani YangiD, Max BraudiD, Edoardo BertoliniiD, Andrea L. EvelandiD
Abstract
Inflorescence architecture in cereals is a major determinant of grain yield and harvestability. Architecture is determined by the number, arrangement and order of lateral branches, which are formed from clusters of stem cells called meristems. Variation in branching patterns arises from regulation of meristem determinacy, i.e., indeterminate meristems maintain meristematic activity allowing for higher order branching and determinate meristems form a terminal organ. The timing by which an indeterminate branch meristem acquires a determinate fate and transitions to a spikelet meristem (SM), ultimately forming the grain-bearing spikelet, defines architecture and grain yield potential. This study leverages the unique inflorescence morphology of model grass Setaria viridis (setaria) to identify factors controlling SM fate and determinacy and characterize their interactions. In setaria, axillary branches terminate either in a spikelet or sterile bristle, where the latter loses SM identity due to brassinosteroid (BR)-mediated disruption of organ boundary formation. A forward genetics screen identified two mutants with only bristles on their panicles; one defective in gibberellic acid (GA) signaling caused extreme elongation and disruption of spikelet development and the other homeotically converted spikelets to bristles. The latter named spikeletless (spkl) was mapped and validated as an ortholog of the maize determinacy factor ramosa1 (ra1). Genetic analyses showed that SvRa1 acts upstream of BR-mediated regulation of SM identity and determinacy. A model is proposed where SvRA1 maintains SM fate by modulating GA homeostasis, spatially restricting BR signaling and preserving boundary gene expression and determinacy. In bristle primordia, which are generally paired with spikelets, GA and BR act synergistically. Comparative analyses in maize highlight pathway conservation in inflorescence architecture with some specific variations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Interspecies transfer of syntenic RAMOSA1 orthologs and promoter cis sequences impacts maize inflorescence architecture
J. Strable, E. Unger-Wallace, … E. Vollbrecht·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2022
- SvFUL2, an A-class MADS-box transcription factor, is necessary for inflorescence determinacy in model panicoid cereal, Setaria viridis
J. Yang, E. BERTOLINI, … A. L. Eveland·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2020
- CLAVATA signalling shapes barley inflorescence architecture by controlling activity and determinacy of shoot apical and rachilla meristems
Isaia Vardanega, Jan Eric Maika, … Rüdiger GW Simon·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2025
- Rate of meristem initiation driven by the MADS-WUS axis contributes to floral survival and inflorescence evolution in grasses
Yongyu Huang, Shuangshuang Zhao, … Thorsten Schnurbusch·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2026
- COMPOSITUM 1 (COM1) contributes to the architectural simplification of barley inflorescence via meristem identity signals
N. Poursarebani, C. Trautewig, … T. Schnurbusch·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2020
- Recruitment of an ancient branching program to suppress carpel development in maize flowers
H. Klein, J. P. Gallagher, … M. E. Bartlett·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2021