Intraoperative biomechanics of lumbar pedicle screw loosening following successful arthrodesis
H. B. Pearson, C. J. Dobbs, E. Grantham, G. L. Niebur, J. L. Chappuis, J. D. Boerckel
Abstract
AbstractPedicle screw loosening has been implicated in recurrent back pain after lumbar spinal fusion, but the degree of loosening has not been systematically quantified in patients. Instrumentation removal is an option for patients with successful arthrodesis, but remains controversial. Here, we quantified pedicle screw loosening by measuring screw insertion and/or removal torque at high statistical power ({beta} = 0.98) in N = 108 patients who experienced pain recurrence despite successful fusion after posterior instrumented lumbar fusion with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (L2-S1). Between implantation and removal, pedicle screw torque was reduced by 58%, indicating significant loosening over time. Loosening was greater in screws with evoked EMG threshold under 11 mA, indicative of screw misplacement. A theoretical stress analysis revealed increased local stresses at the screw interface in pedicles with decreased difference in pedicle thickness and screw diameter. Loosening was greatest in vertebrae at the extremities of the fused segments, but was significantly lower in segments with one level of fusion than in those with two or more.\n\nClinical significanceThese data indicate that pedicle screws can loosen significantly in patients with recurrent back pain and warrant further research into methods to reduce the incidence of screw loosening and to understand the risks and potential benefits of instrumentation removal.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessing the Clinical Utility of Finite Element Analysis Using Post-operative CT-Derived Models: A Material Comparison of Multi-level Spinal Fusion Constructs
Rohan Tewari, Robert D. Johnston, … Ciara M. Murphy·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2026
- Computational modeling of posteroanterior lumbar traction by an automated massage bed: predicting intervertebral disc stresses and deformation
L. Cardoso, N. Khadka, … M. Bikson·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2022
- Evaluating Paraspinal Muscle Response and Compensation via Musculoskeletal Modeling in Spinal Stenosis Surgeries
Ryan Jones, Yogesh Kumaran, … Vijay K. Goel·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2024
- An in vivo rat lumbar spine instability model induced by intervertebral disc injury
Fangxin Xiao, Wendy Noort, … Huub Maas·bioRxiv·May 14, 2025
- Biomechanical Evaluation of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation Based on Finite Element Analysis
Laureb Rao, Samarth Mittal, … Kaushik Mukherjee·Results in EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2025
- Apparent diffusion in nucleus pulposus is associated with pain and mobility improvements after spinal mobilization for acute low back pain
P. Thiry, F. Reumont, … F. Dierick·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2017