bioRxivPathology
Computer-Assisted Mitotic Count Using a Deep Learning-based Algorithm Improves Inter-Observer Reproducibility and Accuracy in canine cutaneous mast cell tumors
C. A. Bertram, M. Aubreville, T. A. Donovan, A. Bartel, F. Wilm, C. Marzahl, C.-A. Assenmacher, K. Becker, M. Bennett, S. Corner, B. Cossic, D. Denk, M. Dettwiler, B. G. Gonzalez, C. Gurtner, A.-K. Haverkamp, A. Heier, A. Lehmbecker, S. Merz, E. L. Noland, S. Plog, A. Schmidt, F. Sebastian, D. G. Sledge, R. C. Smedley, , R. Klopfleisch
Abstract
The mitotic count (MC) is an important histological parameter for prognostication of malignant neoplasms. However, it has inter- and intra-observer discrepancies due to difficulties in selecting the region of interest (MC-ROI) and in identifying/classifying mitotic figures (MFs). Recent progress in the field of artificial intelligence has allowed the development of high-performance algorithms that may improve standardization of the MC. As algorithmic predictions are not flawless, the computer-assisted review by pathologists may ensure reliability. In the present study we have compared partial (MC-ROI preselection) and full (additional visualization of MF candidate proposal and display of algorithmic confidence values) computer-assisted MC analysis to the routine (unaided) MC analysis by 23 pathologists for whole slide images of 50 canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (ccMCTs). Algorithmic predictions aimed to assist pathologists in detecting mitotic hotspot locations, reducing omission of MF and improving classification against imposters. The inter-observer consistency for the MC significantly increased with computer assistance (interobserver correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.92) compared to the unaided approach (ICC = 0.70). Classification into prognostic stratifications had a higher accuracy with computer assistance. The algorithmically preselected MC-ROIs had a consistently higher MCs than the manually selected MC-ROIs. Compared to a ground truth (developed with immunohistochemistry for phosphohistone H3), pathologist performance in detecting individual MF was augmented when using computer assistance (F1-score of 0.68 increased to 0.79) with a reduction in false negatives by 38%. The results of this study prove that computer assistance may lead to a more reproducible and accurate MCs in ccMCTs.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A simple computer vision algorithm as a clinical aid for the pathologist
José M. Lázaro-Guevara, Bryan Josué Flores Robles, … Karim Ashour Garrido·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2019
- Mitosis detection in the wild using detection transformers
Vidushi Walia, Dhandapani Nandagopal, … Bhagat Singh Lali·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Machine-learning convergent melanocytic morphology despite noisy archival slides
Mikio Tada, Garrett Gaskins, … Elizabeth Keiser·Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2025
- Subphase-Labeled Mitotic Dataset for AI-powered Cell Division Analysis
Zsanett Zsófia Iván, Dominik Hirling, … Péter Horváth·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2026
- Collaborative workflow between pathologists and deep learning for evaluation of tumor cellularity in lung adenocarcinoma
T. Sakamoto, T. Furukawa, … J. Fukuoka·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2022
- DeepHeme: A generalizable, bone marrow classifierwith hematopathologist-level performance
Gregory Mark Goldgof, Shenghuan Sun, … Atul Janardhan Butte·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2023