Beyond adoption rates: Farmer motivations and communication needs in straw management decision-making
Abstract
Sustainable bioenergy is central to climate change mitigation, yet biomass supply depends not only on biophysical and economic assessments but also on farmers decision-making. Straw from cereal and oilseed crops can support renewable energy, but its availability is constrained by on-farm uses, management practices, and farmers access to knowledge of sustainable soil management. Because straw removal affects soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, which underpins soil fertility, nutrient cycling, and carbon sequestration, understanding farmers motivations and informational needs is critical to support sustainable straw management. We examined the determinants of straw management among farmers in Scania County, southern Sweden, testing three hypotheses: that manure application increases the likelihood of straw removal, that a higher proportion of leased land promotes straw removal, and that humus-rich soils are associated with a higher probability of straw removal. Survey data from 2021 were analysed using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) and permutation tests, incorporating farmers expected utility. Results show that manure application increases removal probability, whereas a higher share of leased land reduces it. Removal was most frequent on soils with intermediate humus content. Cluster analysis identified three farmer profiles, revealing heterogeneous motivations and knowledge gaps, particularly regarding soil humus content, and underscoring the need for context-specific communication strategies. These findings demonstrate that similar straw management behaviours can arise from diverse motivations and local conditions. Linking expectations, soil properties, and practices provides actionable insights for targeted advisory and policy measures that balance agronomic and economic outcomes with long-term SOC-mediated fertility, carbon sequestration, and ecosystem services.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 15th percentile
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Conversion of marginal land into switchgrass conditionally accrues soil carbon and reduces methane consumption
Colin T. Bates, Arthur Escalas, … Jizhong Z. Zhou·The ISME JournalPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- Residue retention promotes soil carbon accumulation in minimum tillage systems: Implications for conservation tillage
- Identifying win-win opportunities and trade-offs for sustainable agriculture to improve agricultural productivity and soil carbon sequestration: A global meta-analysis
David G. Encarnation, Robert S. Powell, … Adam F. A. Pellegrini·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2025
- Quantifying the effects of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) on deep organic C stocks using natural abundance 14C in three marginal soils
Eric W. Slessarev, Erin E. Nuccio, … Jennifer Pett-Ridge·GCB BioenergyPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2020
- Mixing crop residues induces a synergistic effect on microbial biomass and an additive effect on soil organic matter priming
- Combined application of biochar with nitrogen fertilizer improves soil quality and reduces soil respiration whilst sustaining wheat grain yield in a semiarid environment