Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Transcranial alternating current stimulation affects several alpha components depending on their frequencies relative to the stimulation frequency

Shuka ShibusawaiD, Tomoya KawashimaiD, Kaoru AmanoiD

Abstract

BackgroundThe aftereffects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), especially targeting occipital alpha oscillations, have been reported to show large individual differences in behavioural effects and neural responsiveness. We predicted that this variance at least partly originates from the fact that multiple alpha components are affected differently by alpha-tACS. ObjectiveTo test the above prediction, we decomposed several alpha components from the data and evaluated the aftereffects separately for each component and participant. More specifically, we tested how the difference between the stimulation frequency and peak frequency influences the aftereffects of tACS on each alpha component. MethodsEighteen participants received 20-min tACS or sham stimulation on separate days. Ten minutes of magnetoencephalography data were collected before and after stimulation, and spectral analysis was performed with a high-frequency resolution (0.1 Hz) to disentangle different alpha components based on the difference in peak frequencies and spatial patterns. Results: The results revealed three alpha components with slightly different frequencies. tACS increased or decreased the power of these alpha components depending on the relative frequency difference from electrical stimulation. Furthermore, observable components differed among participants, possibly because of anatomical differences in each alpha source. ConclusionWhen each alpha component is not analysed separately, the change in overall alpha power will be a combination of decreased or increased components, and inter-individual differences will become larger. Our study highlights the importance of noting the presence of multiple alpha components with relatively small differences in the peak frequency for experimental design and analysis.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISRodriguez‐L '26Kasten '24Zarubin '20Kemmerer '20Kasten '18Fuscà '18
86% semantic matchNeuroscience
Julio Rodriguez‐Larios, Anna Ragone, Satyam Chauhan+2 more·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026