Transcutaneous auricular Vagus nerve stimulation for working memory enhancement: A comparative study of electrical and ultrasound stimulation
Alicia Falcon-CaroiD, Nicholas Myers, Marcus KaiseriD, Hyuk ChoiiD, Jae-Jun Song, JeYoung JungiD
Abstract
ObjectivesTranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has shown potential to enhance cognitive function, including working memory. This study investigated the acute effects of both electrical (E-taVNS) and ultrasound (U-taVNS) modalities on working memory using a 3-back task in healthy young adults. We hypothesized that active taVNS would enhance working memory performance relative to sham, and that both stimulation modalities would engage similar neuromodulatory mechanisms. Materials and MethodsFifty-nine participants underwent a single-blind, sham-controlled, within-subject design study, with working memory performance assessed using a 3-back task before and after stimulation. Primary performance measures included correct rejection rate, error false alarm, and sensitivity (d'). Statistical analyses compared pre- and post-stimulation performance across modalities. ResultsE-taVNS significantly enhanced working memory performance through an increase in correct rejection rate and sensitivity (measured by d), alongside a reduction in error of false alarm. U-taVNS showed a similar directional trend across performance measures, although these effects did not reach statistical significance. Baseline anxiety levels significantly predicted individual responsiveness to taVNS. In terms of tolerability, a higher proportion of participants receiving E-taVNS reported skin irritation compared to those receiving U-taVNS. ConclusionsE-taVNS can acutely enhance working memory performance, while U-taVNS may offer a comparable, better tolerated alternative. Our findings highlight the potential of taVNS to support memory function, while showing the importance of further research to clarify modality-specific effects and optimize stimulation parameters.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 36%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Vibrotactile transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) during working memory: convergent electrophysiological evidence for cortical efficiency
Gansheng Tan, Phillip Demarest, … Eric C. Leuthardt·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026
- Comparing Electrical and Ultrasound Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) on Associative Memory
Benjamin James Griffiths, Ziqi He, … JeYoung Jung·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2026
- Does Vibrotactile Stimulation of the Auricular Vagus Nerve Enhance Working Memory? A Behavioral and Physiological Investigation
Gansheng Tan, Josh Adams, … Eric C. Leuthardt·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2024
- Ultrasound transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhances semantic processing
Youbin Kang, Marcus Kaiser, JeYoung Jung·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2026
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhances emotional bias towards happiness in healthy young adults: A comparative study of electrical and ultrasound stimulation
June Christoph Kang, J. Ng, … JeYoung Jung·Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural InterfacePeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026
- Cognitive and autonomic physiological responses to daily transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in healthy adults
Shawn D. Flanagan, Rodman D. Tompkins, … Christopher Connaboy·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2025