bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Interpretable Distillation Reveals that Deep-learning-based Splicing Models Suffer from Pervasive Confounders and Blind Spots
Abstract
Despite their growing popularity, genomic deep-learning-based models function largely as black boxes, raising concerns about their trustworthiness. Here we develop a framework to explain model prediction logic using interpretable distillation. Applying our framework, we find that RNA splicing prediction models suffer from pervasive confounders and blind spots, leading to poor performance on non-reference sequences. Our findings illuminate fundamental limitations of training models on genomic sequences and suggest ways to overcome them.
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sequence models conditioned on splicing factor expression predict splicing in unseen tissues
Aniketh Janardhan Reddy, Peter H. Sudmant, Nilah M. Ioannidis·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2026
- Deep learning models for identification of splice junctions across species
Aparajita Dutta, Kusum Kumari Singh, Ashish Anand·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2021
- Integrative Deep Models for Alternative Splicing
Anupama Jha, Matthew R. Gazzara, Yoseph Barash·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2017
- Improving interpretability of deep learning models: splicing codes as a case study
Anupama Jha, Joseph K. Aicher, … Yoseph Barash·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2019
- Machine learning for discovery: deciphering RNA splicing logic
Susan E. Liao, Mukund Sudarshan, Oded Regev·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2022
- Neural RNA splicing models rely on reading frame information unavailable to the splicing machinery
Kavi Gupta, Bixuan Wang, … Armando Solar-Lezama·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026