Integrating multi-OMICS data through sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis for predicting complex traits: A comparative study
Theodoulos RodosthenousiD, Vahid ShahrezaeiiD, Marina EvangelouiD
Abstract
MotivationRecent developments in technology have enabled researchers to collect multiple OMICS datasets for the same individuals. The conventional approach for understanding the relationships between the collected datasets and the complex trait of interest would be through the analysis of each OMIC dataset separately from the rest, or to test for associations between the OMICS datasets. In this work we show that by integrating multiple OMICS datasets together, instead of analysing them separately, improves our understanding of their in-between relationships as well as the predictive accuracy for the tested trait. As OMICS datasets are heterogeneous and high-dimensional (p >> n) integrating them can be done through Sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis (sCCA) that penalises the canonical variables for producing sparse latent variables while achieving maximal correlation between the datasets. Over the last years, a number of approaches for implementing sCCA have been proposed, where they differ on their objective functions, iterative algorithm for obtaining the sparse latent variables and make different assumptions about the original datasets. ResultsThrough a comparative study we have explored the performance of the conventional CCA proposed by Parkhomenko et al. [2009], penalised matrix decomposition CCA proposed by Witten and Tibshirani [2009] and its extension proposed by Suo et al. [2017]. The aferomentioned methods were modified to allow for different penalty functions. Although sCCA is an unsupervised learning approach for understanding of the in-between relationships, we have twisted the problem as a supervised learning one and investigated how the computed latent variables can be used for predicting complex traits. The approaches were extended to allow for multiple (more than two) datasets where the trait was included as one of the input datasets. Both ways have shown improvement over conventional predictive models that include one or multiple datasets. Contacttr1915@ic.ac.uk
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Uncovering Cross-Cohort Molecular Features with Multi-Omics Integration Analysis
Min-Zhi Jiang, François Aguet, … TOPMed Analysis Working Group·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2022
- A Generalized Higher-order Correlation Analysis Framework for Multi-Omics Network Inference
W. M. Liu, Katherine Pratte, … Katerina J. Kechris·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 14, 2025
- SmCCNet 2.0: A Comprehensive Tool for Multi-omics Network Inference
W. M. Liu, Thao Vu, … Katerina J. Kechris·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 23, 2024
- Multiset correlation and factor analysis enables exploration of multi-omic data
Brielin C. Brown, Collin Wang, … Tuuli Lappalainen·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2023
- Adventures in Multi-Omics I: Combining heterogeneous data sets via relationships matrices
Deniz Akdemir, R. E. Knox, Julio Isidro y Sánchez·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2020
- A multivariate outcome test of covariance
Christophe Boetto, Arthur Frouin, … Hugues Aschard·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2023