henhaobio
Sign in

American Journal of Veterinary ResearchBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article

Assessment of Augmented Reality Glasses for Spatial Tracking and Intraoperative Annotation in Veterinary Surgery

Yash TipirneniiD, Boaz ArziiD, Andrew BlandinoiD, Chrisoula Toupadakis Skouritakis, Stephanie Lynne GoldschmidtiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

ObjectivesAugmented reality (AR) glasses may improve surgical precision by projecting holographic overlays directly onto the surgical field. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of AR technology for enhancing spatial tracking. MethodsWe developed an AR application in Unity compatible with XReal glasses that allowed users to annotate and interact with a realistic 3D hologram of a dog head. Resident and specialist veterinarians were recruited to completed coordinate (distance) and outline (area) annotations under two conditions: (1) transfer: memorizing targets from a computer screen, and (2) direct: seeing the targets directly on the head. Distance errors, area metrics, and completion times were recorded from each participant. ResultsThe mean distance error (N = 22) was significantly lower for direct versus transfer coordinates (2.73 {+/-} 0.79 mm vs. 3.42 {+/-} 1.81 mm). Area coverage (N = 20) was higher (83.7% {+/-} 13.4% vs. 63.3% {+/-} 16.2) and non-overlap was similarly reduced with AR-guidance. Completion times differed significantly between the transfer and direct groups for coordinate tasks (11.2 {+/-} 10.4 sec versus 8.19 {+/-} sec) but not for area tracing (25.7 {+/-} 18.3 sec versus 26.8 {+/-} 26.5 sec). ConclusionAR-guided visualization improved spatial accuracy for both distance and area metrics without reducing speed. The effects observed for specialty, eyewear, or arm length were negligible. However, the level of experience with a cutoff of 2 years did have a significant effect on distance error. Clinical RelevanceThese findings support the utility of AR for optimizing surgical precision in veterinary medicine.

Citations
1
FWCI
2.86
Field percentile
top 8%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMaidenbaum '19Ahrens '19Abdlkarim '22Vishniakou '19Stone '22Kwak '18
61% semantic matchNeuroscience
Shachar Maidenbaum, Ansh Patel, Isaiah Garlin+1 more·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2019· 14 citations