Evolutionary design of regulatory control. II. Robust error-correcting feedback increases genetic and phenotypic variability
Abstract
As systems become more robust against perturbations, they can compensate for greater sloppiness in the performance of their components. That robust compensation reduces the force of natural selection on the systems components, leading to component decay. The paradoxical coupling of robustness and decay predicts that robust systems evolve cheaper, lower performing components, which accumulate greater mutational genetic variability and which have greater phenotypic stochasticity in trait expression. Previous work noted the paradox of robustness. However, no general theory for the evolutionary dynamics of system robustness and component decay has been developed. This article takes a first step by linking engineering control theory with the genetic theory of evolutionary dynamics. Control theory emphasizes error-correcting feedback as the single greatest principle in robust system design. Linking control theory to evolution leads to a theory for the evolutionary dynamics of error-correcting feedback, a unifying approach for the evolutionary analysis of robust systems. In this article, I study how, in theory, increasingly robust systems accumulate more genetic variability and greater stochasticity of expression in their components. The theory predicts different levels of variability between different regulatory control architectures and different levels of variability between different components within a particular regulatory control system. Those predictions provide a way to understand the accumulating data on genetic variability and single-cell stochasticity of gene expression. I also show that increasing robustness reduces the frequency of system failures associated with disease and, simultaneously, causes a strong increase in the heritability of disease. Thus, robust error correction in biological regulatory control may partly explain the puzzlingly high heritability of disease and, more generally, the surprisingly high heritability of fitness.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Field percentile
- top 34%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evolutionary design of regulatory control. I. A robust control theory analysis of tradeoffs
S. A. Frank·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2018
- Robustness increases heritability: implications for familial disease
S. A. Frank·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2022
- A robust relationship between robustness and evolvability
Nate B. Hardy·EvolutionPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2025
- Using developmental dynamics for evolutionary prediction and control
L. Milocco, T. Uller·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2023
- Evolutionary Dynamics, Evolutionary Forces, and Robustness: A Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics Perspective
R. Rao, S. Leibler·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2022
- Variance reduction for antithetic integral control of stochastic reaction networks
Corentin Briat, Ankit Gupta, Mustafa Khammash·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2018