bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
A scalable approach to resolving variants of uncertain significance
Malvika TejuraiD, Y P CheniD, Abbye E. McEweniD, Ross StewartiD, Yuriy SverchkoviD, Florent LavaliD, Ivan M. H. WooiD, Daniel ZeibergiD, Runxi SheniD, Shawn FayeriD, Jeremy StoneiD, Nahum T. SmithiD, Silvia CasadeiiD, Ziyu R. WangiD, Matthew W. SnyderiD, Benjamin J. CapodannoiD, Pankhuri GuptaiD, Mariam BenazouziD, Shantanu JainiD, Sarah HeidliD, Lara A. MuffleyiD, Shengcheng DongiD, Benjamin C. HitziD, Idan GabdankiD, Khine Zin LiniD, , Lea M. StaritaiD
Abstract
Over 90% of missense variants across [~]4,000 disease-associated genes are variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Experimental variant effect measurements provide critical evidence about pathogenicity and inform disease biology, but most variants lack data and clinical translation has been limited. The Impact of Genomic Variation on Function Consortium generated experimental data for 62,215 variants across ten genes using multiplexed assays and 1,407 variants across 163 genes using arrayed assays, curated 193,139 additional community-generated variant effect measurements across 30 additional genes, and developed automated calibration methods for translating experimental data and variant effect predictions into clinical evidence. To reduce current VUS, we developed a scalable workflow using only experimental and predictive evidence, enabling reclassification of 75% of the 16,115 VUS in these genes as pathogenic or benign with 90,000 unobserved variants; 62% had enough evidence to be "preclassified" as pathogenic or benign. We validated our data, evidence and classifications using All of Us and created interactive resources to enable clinical use of the calibrated data. Thus, for 40 genes, representing 1% of the clinical genome, we resolve most existing VUS and future variants, illustrating how systematic use of scalable evidence can empower genomic medicine.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- From Uncertain to Actionable: Significant Reduction in Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Germline Testing via Multi-Institutional Real-World Evidence
Kelly M. Schiabor Barrett, Matthew J. Ferber, … Elizabeth T. Cirulli·medRxiv·Aug 12, 2025
- Language models reveal evidence gaps in variants of uncertain significance
Weijiang Li, Vineel Bhat, … Christopher A. Cassa·medRxiv·Mar 2, 2026
- VUSVista: Enhancing the Curation of Variants of Uncertain Significance
Esther Spiteri, Jeanesse Scerri, Jean-Paul Ebejer·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2025
- Extracting and calibrating evidence of variant pathogenicity from population biobank data
Vineel Bhat, Tian Yu, … Christopher A. Cassa·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2025
- Distinct rates of VUS reclassification are observed when subclassifying VUS by evidence level
Gwendolyn Bennett, Izabela Karbassi, … Heidi L. Rehm·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2025
- 'Truthsets' for clinical validation of large-scale functional assays: Practice recommendations from Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK)
Sophie Allen, Charlie F Rowlands, … Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK)·medRxiv·Jul 13, 2026