Reward actively engages both implicit and explicit components in dual force field adaptation
Abstract
Motor learning occurs through multiple mechanisms, including unsupervised, supervised (error-based) and reinforcement (reward-based) learning. Although studies have shown that reward leads to an overall better motor adaptation, the specific processes by which reward influences adaptation are still unclear. Here, we examine how the presence of reward affects dual-adaptation to novel dynamics, and distinguish its influence on implicit and explicit learning. Participants adapted to two opposing force fields in an adaptation/de-adaptation/error-clamp paradigm, where five levels of reward (a score and a digital face) were provided as participants reduced their lateral error. Both reward and control (no reward provided) groups simultaneously adapted to both opposing force fields, exhibiting a similar final level of adaptation, which was primarily implicit. Triple-rate models fit to the adaptation process found higher learning rates in the fast and slow processes, and a slightly increased fast retention rate for the reward group. While differences in the slow learning rate were only driven by implicit learning, the large difference in the fast learning rate was mainly explicit. Overall, we confirm previous work showing that reward increases learning rates, extending this to dual-adaptation experiments, and demonstrating that reward influences both implicit and explicit adaptation. Specifically, we show that reward acts primarily explicitly on the fast learning rate and implicitly on the slow learning rates. New and NoteworthyHere we show that rewarding participants performance during dual force field adaptation primarily affects the initial rate of learning and the early timescales of adaptation, with little effect on the final adaptation level. However, reward affects both explicit and implicit components of adaptation. While the learning rate of the slow process is increased implicitly, the fast learning and retention rates are increased through both implicit components and the use of explicit strategies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Field percentile
- top 25%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning
Hyosub E. Kim, Darius E. Parvin, Richard B. Ivry·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2019
- Explicit reward stabilizes motor output by attenuating sensory prediction error driven learning
Gaurav Panthi, Pratik K. Mutha·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2026
- Direct and indirect cues can enable dual-adaptation, but through different learning processes
Marion Forano, Raphael Schween, … David W. Franklin·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 22, 2021
- Implicit Adaptation is Fast, Robust and Independent from Explicit Adaptation
Sebastian D’Amario, Jennifer E. Ruttle, … Denise Y. P. Henriques·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2024
- Instrumental-Motor Transfer: The Relative Value of Competing Movement Goals Modulates Implicit Motor Learning
Naser Al-Fawakhiri, Vikram S. Chib, Samuel D. McDougle·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Explicit strategies in force field adaptation
Raphael Schween, Samuel D. McDougle, … Jordan A. Taylor·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2020