bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Incidental Eagle Carcass Detection Can Contribute to Fatality Estimation at Operating Wind Facilities
Abstract
Risk of birds colliding with wind turbines, especially protected species like bald eagle and golden eagle, is a fundamental wildlife challenge the wind industry faces when developing and operating projects. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requires wind facilities that obtain eagle take permits to document permit compliance through eagle fatality monitoring. If trained Operations and Maintenance (O&M) staff can reliably detect and report carcasses during their normal routines, then their incidental detections could contribute substantially to meeting monitoring requirements required by eagle take permits. The primary objective of this study was to quantify incidental detection of eagle carcasses by O&M staff under a variety of landscape contexts and environmental conditions throughout 1 year. We used the incidental detection probabilities (proportion of decoys detected by O&M staff), along with raptor carcass persistence data and area adjustments, to calculate overall probability of incidental detection (i.e., incidental g). We used feathered turkey decoys as eagle-carcass surrogates for monthly detection trials at 6 study sites throughout the U.S. We evaluated the primary drivers of incidental detection using logit regression models including season, viewshed complexity, and a derived variable called the "density quartile" as covariates. We used an Evidence of Absence-based approach to estimate the overall probability of incidental detection. Detection probabilities decreased as viewshed complexity increased and as distance from the turbine increased. The resulting overall probability of incidental detection for the 12-month period ranged from 0.07 to 0.47 (mean = 0.31). The primary drivers of variability in incidental g were detection probability and the area adjustment. Results of our research show that O&M staff were capable of incidentally detecting trial carcasses while performing their typical duties. Incorporating incidental detection by O&M staff in eagle fatality monitoring efforts is a reliable means of improving estimates of a facilitys direct impacts on eagles.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Viability of carcass removal as an option for offsetting the incidental take of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) at wind energy facilities
E. V. Lonsdorf, J. S. Gerber, … T. D. Allison·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2022
- A flexible point and variance estimator to assess bird/bat fatality from carcass searches
M. Mercker·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2021
- GAME BIRD CARCASSES ARE LESS PERSISTENT THAN RAPTOR CARCASSES, BUT CAN PREDICT RAPTOR PERSISTENCE DYNAMICS
E. Hallingstad, D. Riser-Espinoza, … K. Kosciuch·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2022
- Unpacking the eagle collision risk model: practical guidance for wind energy
M. J. Evans, M. Sporer, … J. Page·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2020
- Evidence of Absence Regression: A Binomial N-Mixture Model for Estimating Fatalities at Wind Power Facilities
T. McDonald, K. Bay, … J. McIvor·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2020
- Remotely-sensed tornado signatures indicate an ecological threshold for eagle nest destruction
Jeremy D. Ross, Cheryl L. Cavert, Lena C. Larsson·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2016