Distribution of the National Science Foundation's Advancing Informal STEM Learning Awards (AISL) between 2006-21
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic tested many fundamental connections between science and society. A growing field working to strengthen those connections exists within the informal STEM learning (ISL) community which provides diverse learning and engagement environments outside the formal classroom. One of the largest funders of ISL initiatives is the National Science Foundation (NSF) which runs the Advanced Informal STEM Learning (AISL) program in the United States. The AISL program supports initiatives through six categories that include pilots and feasibility studies, research in service to practice, innovations in development, broad implementation, literature reviews, syntheses, or meta-analyses, and conferences. However, a number of questions remain unanswered with respect to the distribution and ultimately the broad impact of the awards. In this study, we analyzed publicly available awardee information across a 15-year period (2006-2021) to provide a preliminary analysis of how the AISL grants are distributed across individual states, organizations, and the principal investigators. Several states, organizations, and principal investigators stood out as prolific awardees. Massachusetts and California represented the largest share of awards at 14% and 13% respectively during that time. WGBH Educational Foundation located in Massachusetts and the Exploratorium located in California, received the largest number of awards during the 15 year period. Notably, 67% of the AISL awards list at least one co-principal investigator. Our report brings to light a number of new questions and charts new paths of exploration for future studies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- National Institutes of Health Institute and Center Award Rates and Funding Disparities
M. S. Lauer, J. Doyle, … D. Roychowdhury·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2020
- Public Funding for AI in Canada 2011-2022: An equity-focused environmental scan
Ghislaine Attema, Megan Mertz, … Erin Cameron·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2025
- Inequalities in the Distribution of National Institutes of Health Research Project Grant Funding
M. S. Lauer, D. Roychowdhury·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2021
- High cost of bias: Diminishing marginal returns on NIH grant funding to institutions
Wayne P. Wahls·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2018
- Retrospective Analysis of the Effects of BWF Interdisciplinary Postdoctoral to Faculty Transition Awards on Future Funding Success
Mandeep K Sekhon, Melanie Scott, … Miquella C. Rose·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2024
- Science in School: Transforming K-12 Outreach through Scientist Teacher Partnerships
B. Abramowitz, M. Ennes, … A. Ivory·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2021