The relationship between eDNA particle concentration and organism abundance in nature is strengthened by allometric scaling
M. C. Yates, D. Glaser, J. R. Post, M. E. Cristescu, D. J. Fraser, A. M. Derry
Abstract
Organism abundance is a critical parameter in ecology, but its estimation is often challenging. Approaches utilizing eDNA to indirectly estimate abundance have recently generated substantial interest. However, preliminary correlations observed between eDNA concentration and abundance in nature are typically moderate in strength with significant unexplained variation. Here we apply a novel approach to integrate allometric scaling coefficients into models of eDNA concentration and organism abundance. We hypothesize that eDNA particle production scales non-linearly with mass, with scaling coefficients < 1. Wild populations often exhibit substantial variation in individual body size distributions; we therefore predict that the distribution of mass across individuals within a population will influence population-level eDNA production rates. To test our hypothesis, we collected standardized body size distribution and mark-recapture abundance data using whole-lake experiments involving nine populations of brook trout. We correlated eDNA concentration with three metrics of abundance: density (individuals/ha), biomass (kg/ha), and allometrically scaled mass (ASM) ({sum}(individual mass0.73)/ha). Density and biomass were both significantly positively correlated with eDNA concentration (adj. R2 = 0.59 and 0.63, respectively), but ASM exhibited improved model fit (adj. R2 = 0.78). We also demonstrate how estimates of ASM derived from eDNA samples in unknown systems can be converted to biomass or density estimates with additional size structure data. Future experiments should empirically validate allometric scaling coefficients for eDNA production, particularly where substantial intraspecific size distribution variation exists. Incorporating allometric scaling may improve predictive models to the extent that eDNA concentration may become a reliable indicator of abundance in nature.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Interspecific allometric scaling in eDNA production in fishes reflects physiological and surface area allometry
M. C. Yates, T. Wilcox, … D. Heath·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2022
- Towards a framework to unify the relationship between numerical abundance, biomass, and quantitative eDNA
M. C. Yates, T. M. Wilcox, … D. Heath·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2022
- eDNA provides accurate population abundance estimates with bioenergetics and particle mass-balance modelling
Julien Beaulieu, Matthew C. Yates, … Alison Margaret Derry·Molecular EcologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2026
- Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds
Cristina Di Muri, Lori Lawson Handley, … Bernd Hänfling·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2020
- A strong relationship between environmental DNA metabarcoding and rank-based abundance of fish
Joanne E. Littlefair, Lauren D. Hayhurst, … Melania E. Cristescu·Journal of Applied EcologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2026
- Estimation of Species Abundance Based on the Number of Segregating Sites using Environmental DNA (eDNA)
Qiaoyun Ai, Hao Yuan, … Chenhong Li·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2025