A Population Receptive Field Model of the Magnetoencephalography Response
Eline R. KupersiD, Akhil Edadan, Noah Charles BensoniD, Wietske Zuiderbaan, Maartje C. de JongiD, Serge Olaf DumouliniD, Jonathan A. WinaweriD
Abstract
1Computational models which predict the neurophysiological response from experimental stimuli have played an important role in human neuroimaging. One type of computational model, the population receptive field (pRF), has been used to describe cortical responses at the millimeter scale using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electrocorticography (ECoG). However, pRF models are not widely used for non-invasive electromagnetic field measurements (EEG/MEG), because individual sensors pool responses originating from several centimeter of cortex, containing neural populations with widely varying spatial tuning. Here, we introduce a forward-modeling approach in which pRFs estimated from fMRI data are used to predict MEG sensor responses. Subjects viewed contrast-reversing bar stimuli sweeping across the visual field in separate fMRI and MEG sessions. Individual subjects pRFs were modeled on the cortical surface at the millimeter scale using the fMRI data. We then predicted cortical time series and projected these predictions to MEG sensors using a biophysical MEG forward model, accounting for the pooling across cortex. We compared the predicted MEG responses to observed visually evoked steady-state responses measured in the MEG session. We found that pRF parameters estimated by fMRI could explain a substantial fraction of the variance in steady-state MEG sensor responses (up to 60% in individual sensors). Control analyses in which we artificially perturbed either pRF size or pRF position reduced MEG prediction accuracy, indicating that MEG data are sensitive to pRF properties derived from fMRI. Our model provides a quantitative approach to link fMRI and MEG measurements, thereby enabling advances in our understanding of spatiotemporal dynamics in human visual field maps.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Field percentile
- top 41%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Characterizing spatiotemporal population receptive fields in human visual cortex with fMRI
Insub Kim, Eline R. Kupers, … Kalanit Grill-spector A·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2023
- Computational simulations reproduce in vivo population receptive field mapping fMRI results
Siddharth Mittal, Michael Woletz, … Christian Windischberger·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2026
- Hemodynamic modelling improves population receptive field estimates
Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf, Ecem Altan, … Catherine Morgan·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2025
- Myelin-informed forward models for M/EEG source reconstruction
Saskia Helbling, Sofie S. Meyer, Nikolaus Weiskopf·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2024
- Convex Optimized Population Receptive Field (CO-pRF) Mapping
David Slater, Lester Melie‐García, … Ferath Kherif·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2017
- Reconciling fMRI and EEG indices of attentional modulations in human visual cortex
Sirawaj Itthipuripat, Thomas C. Sprague, John T. Serences·bioRxiv·Aug 13, 2018