bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Extending site-based observations to predict the spatial patterns of vegetation structure and composition
M. McNellie, I. Oliver, S. Ferrier, G. Newell, G. Manion, P. Griffioen, M. White, T. Koen, M. Somerville, P. Gibbons
Abstract
ContextConservation planning and land management are inherently spatial processes that are most effective when implemented over large areas.\n\nObjectivesOur objectives were to (i) use existing plot data to aggregate species inventories to growth forms and derive indicators of vegetation structure and composition and ii) generate spatially-explicit, continuous, landscape scaled models of these discrete vegetation indicators, accompanied by maps of model uncertainty.\n\nMethodUsing a case study from New South Wales, Australia, we aggregated floristic observations from 7234 sites into growth forms. We trained ensembles of artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict the distribution of these indicators over a broad region covering 11.5 million hectares. Importantly, we show spatially explicit models of uncertainty so that end-users have a tangible and transparent means of assessing models.\n\nResultsOur key findings were firstly, widely available site-based floristic records can be used to derive aggregated indicators of the structure and composition of plant growth forms. Secondly, ANNs are a powerful method to predict continuous patterns in complex, non-linear data (Pearsons correlation coefficient 0.83 (total native vegetation cover) to 0.42 (forb cover)). Thirdly, maps of the standardised residual error give insight into model performance and provide an assessment of model uncertainty in specific locations.\n\nConclusionsSpatially explicit, continuous representations of vegetation composition and structural complexity can add considerable value to conventional maps of vegetation extent or community type. This application has the potential to enhance the capacity for conservation planners, landscape managers and policy-makers to make informed decisions across landscape and regional scales.
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: deep learning
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A predictive model of fractional land use
S. Kapitza, N. Golding, B. A. Wintle·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2020
- Extinction risk predictions for the world's flowering plants to support their conservation
S. P. Bachman, M. J. M. Brown, … B. Walker·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2023
- Tracking savanna vegetation structure in South Africa by extension of GEDI canopy metrics with Landsat, Sentinel-2, and PALSAR
Steven K. Filippelli, Jody C. Vogeler, … David N. Bunn·Science of Remote SensingPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2026
- Predicting future patterns of land cover from climate projections using machine learning
T. F. Stepinski·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2024
- Using generalised dissimilarity modelling and targeted field surveys to gap-fill an ecosystem surveillance network
G. R. Guerin, K. J. Williams, … B. Sparrow·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2020
- Individual tree crown maps for the National Ecological Observatory Network
B. Weinstein, S. Marconi, … E. P. White·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2023