Counterconditioning following memory retrieval diminishes reinstatement of appetitive memories in humans

Abstract

Appetitive memories play a crucial role in learning and behavior but under certain circumstances become maladaptive and play a vital part in addiction and other psychopathologies. In recent years, scientific research demonstrated the ability of memories to be modified following their reactivation through memory retrieval, in a process termed memory reconsolidation. Several non-pharmacological behavioral manipulations yielded mixed results in their capacity to alter maladaptive memories in humans. Here, aiming to translate promising findings observed in rodents to humans, we constructed a novel three-day procedure to test the efficacy of aversive counterconditioning to alter appetitive memories when given following memory retrieval. On Day1 we used appetitive conditioning to form appetitive memories. On Day2, we retrieved these appetitive memories for half of the participants (Retrieval group). Subsequently, all participants underwent counterconditioning. On Day3, we tried to reinstate Day1 appetitive memories. We observed a significant reduction in the reinstatement of the original appetitive memory when counterconditioning was induced following memory retrieval. We provide here a novel human paradigm that models several memory processes, and demonstrate memory attenuation when counterconditioned after its retrieval. This paradigm can be used to study complex appetitive memory dynamics, e.g., memory reconsolidation, and their underlying brain mechanisms.