bioRxivMicrobiology
Comparison of single nucleotide variants identified by Illumina and Oxford Nanopore technologies in the context of a potential outbreak of Shiga Toxin Producing Escherichia coli.
Abstract
BackgroundWe aimed to compare Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing data from the two isolates of STEC O157:H7 to determine whether concordant single nucleotide variants were identified and whether inference of relatedness was consistent with the two technologies.\n\nResultsFor the Illumina workflow, the time from DNA extraction to availability of results, was approximately 40 hours in comparison to the ONT workflow where serotyping, Shiga toxin subtyping variant identification were available within seven hours. After optimisation of the ONT variant filtering, on average 95% of the discrepant positions between the technologies were accounted for by methylated positions found in the described 5-Methylcytosine motif sequences, CC(A/T)GG. Of the few discrepant variants (6 and 7 difference for the two isolates) identified by the two technologies, it is likely that both methodologies contain false calls.\n\nConclusionsDespite these discrepancies, Illumina and ONT sequences from the same case were placed on the same phylogenetic location against a dense reference database of STEC O157:H7 genomes sequenced using the Illumina workflow. Robust SNP typing using MinION-based variant calling is possible and we provide evidence that the two technologies can be used interchangeably to type STEC O157:H7 in a public health setting.
- organism: E. coli
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: phylogenetics / evolution
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessment of Oxford Nanopore whole genome sequencing for large-scale genomic characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus
Ingvild Haugan, Helene Marie Flatby, … Christina Gabrielsen Ås·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2026
- Evaluation of Nanopore sequencing technology to differentiate Salmonella serotypes and serotype variants with the same or closely related antigenic formulae
F. Xu, C. Ge, … R. C. Baker·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2020
- Rapid, multiplexed, whole genome and plasmid sequencing of foodborne pathogens using long-read nanopore technology
T. L. Taylor, J. D. Volkening, … C. L. Afonso·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2019
- Subtyping evaluation of Salmonella Enteritidis using SNP and core genome MLST with nanopore reads
- Validation of an optimised Oxford Nanopore sequencing workflow versus Illumina for mycobacteria from primary MGIT culture
Catriona S Baker, Matthew Colpus, … Derrick W. Crook·bioRxiv·May 8, 2026
- Nanopore sequencing for fast determination of plasmids, phages, virulence markers, and antimicrobial resistance genes in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli
Narjol González‐Escalona, Marc William Allard, … Maria Hoffmann·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2019