bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Identification of qPCR reference genes suitable for normalising gene expression in the developing mouse embryo
John C. W. HildyardiD, Dominic J. WellsiD, Richard J. PiercyiD
Abstract
Mammalian embryogenesis is an intricate, tightly orchestrated process. Progression from zygote through somitogenesis and on to organogenesis and maturity involves many interacting cell types and multiple differentiating cell lineages. Quantitative PCR analysis of gene expression in the developing embryo is a valuable tool for deciphering these interactions and tracing lineages, but normalisation of qPCR data to stably expressed reference genes is essential. Patterns of gene expression change globally and dramatically as embryonic development proceeds, rendering identification of appropriate reference genes challenging at both the whole embryo- and individual tissue-level. We have investigated expression stability in mouse embryos from mid to late gestation (E11.5-E18.5), both at the whole-embryo level, and within more restricted tissue domains (head, developing forelimb), using 15 candidate reference genes (ACTB, 18S, SDHA, GAPDH, HTATSF1, CDC40, RPL13A, CSNK2A2, AP3D1, HPRT1, CYC1, EIF4A, UBC, B2M and PAK1IP1), and four complementary algorithms (geNorm, Normfinder, Bestkeeper and deltaCt). Unexpectedly, all methods suggest that many genes within our candidate panel are acceptable references, and despite disagreement over highest-scoring candidates, AP3D1, RPL14A and PAK1IP1 are the strongest performing genes overall. Conversely, HPRT1 and B2M are consistently poor choices: these genes show strong developmental regulation. We further show that use of AP3D1, RPL13A and PAK1IP1 can reveal subtle patterns of developmental expression even in genes ostensibly ranked as acceptable (CDC40, HTATSF1), and thus these three represent universally suitable reference genes for the mouse embryo.
- organism: mouse
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimal use of statistical methods to validate reference gene stability in longitudinal studies
Venkat Krishnan Sundaram, Nirmal Kumar Sampathkumar, … Julien Grenier·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2019
- Developmental and Environmental Stability of Candidate Reference Genes in the Wild Bee Ceratina calcarata
Zixiao Zhao, Rameshwor Pudasaini, … Hongmei Li‐Byarlay·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2025
- RNA-Seq is not required to determine stable reference genes for qPCR normalization
Nirmal Kumar Sampathkumar, Venkat Krishnan Sundaram, … Jacqueline C. Mitchell·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2022
- Innovative GenExpA software for selecting suitable reference genes for reliable normalization of gene expression in melanoma
D. Hoja-Lukowicz, D. Maciazek, … M. E. Janik·bioRxiv·May 10, 2021
- Selection and validation of reference genes for quantitative Real-Time PCR in Arabis alpina
Lisa Stephan, Vicky Tilmes, Martin Hülskamp·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2019
- Identification of stable reference genes for quantitative PCR in koalas
Nishat Sarker, J. Fabijan, … Rachael Eugenie Tarlinton·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Feb 14, 2018