henhaobio
Sign in

BMC GenomicsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

Performance Comparison Of Agilent New SureSelect All Exon v8 Probes With v7 Probes For Exome Sequencing

Vera BelovaiD, Anna O. ShmitkoiD, Anna S. PavlovaiD, Robert AfasizheviD, Valery V. CheraneviD, Anastasia Tabanakova, Natalya Ponikarovskaya, Denis V. RebrikoviD, Dmitriy O. KorostiniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Exome sequencing may become routine in health care it increases the chance of pinpointing the genetic cause of an individual patients condition and thus making an accurate diagnosis. It is important for facilities providing genetic services to keep track of changes in the technology of exome capture in order to maximize throughput while reducing cost per sample. In this study, we focused on comparing the newly released exome probe set Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v8 and the previous probe set v7. In preparation for higher throughput of exome sequencing using the DNBSEQ-G400, we evaluated target design, coverage statistics, and variants across these two different exome capture products. Although the target size of the v8 design has not changed much compared to the v7 design (35.24 Mb vs 35.8 Mb), the v8 probe design allows you to call more of SNVs (+3.06%) and indels (+8.49%) with the same number of raw reads per sample on the common target regions (34.84 Mb). Our results suggest that the new Agilent v8 probe set for exome sequencing yields better data quality than the current Agilent v7 set.

Citations
15
FWCI
1.96
Field percentile
top 14%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBelova '25Fridman '21Belova '22Seo '20Belkadi '15Lorente-Are '16
69% semantic matchGenomics
Vera Belova, Iuliia A. Vasiliadis, Zhanna A. Repinskaia+10 more·BMC Genomics·Jan 27, 2025· 11 citations