Comparative evaluation of four exome enrichment solutions in 2024: Agilent, Roche, Vazyme and Nanodigmbio
Vera BelovaiD, Iuliia A. VasiliadisiD, Zhanna A. RepinskaiaiD, Самитова Алина ФаритовнаiD, Anna O. ShmitkoiD, Natalya Ponikarovskaya, Oleg N. SuchalkoiD, Valery V. CheraneviD, Peter Alekseevich ShataloviD, П. В. ШегайiD, Kaprin AndreyiD, Denis V. RebrikoviD, Dmitriy O. KorostiniD
Abstract
Whole exome sequencing (WES) is essential for identifying genetic variants linked to diseases. This study compares available to date four exome enrichment kits: Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v8, Roche KAPA HyperExome Probes, Vazyme VAHTS Target Capture Core Exome Panel, and Nanodigmbio NEXome Plus Panel v1. We evaluated target design, coverage statistics, and variant calling accuracy across these four different exome capture products. All kits showed high coverage completeness, with mean x10 coverage exceeding 97.5% and x20 coverage above 95%. Roche exhibited the most uniform coverage, indicated by the lowest fold-80 scores, while Nanodigmbio had more on-target reads due to fewer off-target reads. Variant calling performance, evaluated using in-lab standard E701 DNA sample, showed high recall rates for all kits, especially Agilent v8. All kits achieved an F-measure above 95.87%. Nanodigmbio had the highest precision with the fewest false positives but a slightly lower F-measure than other kits. This study also highlights the performance of new Chinese solutions from Vazyme and Nanodigmbio, which were comparable to Agilent v8 and Roche KAPA kits. These findings assist researchers and clinicians in selecting appropriate exome capture solutions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Performance Comparison Of Agilent New SureSelect All Exon v8 Probes With v7 Probes For Exome Sequencing
Vera Belova, Anna O. Shmitko, … Dmitriy O. Korostin·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2022
- Analyzing Performance of Twist Bioscience Exome Enrichment with Spike-in CNV Backbone Panels at Various Probe Densities Leveraging Golden Helix VS-CNV Analysis Software
Nathan Fortier, Gabe Rudy, … Andreas Scherer·bioRxiv·May 19, 2024
- Performance Assessment of Variant Calling Pipelines using Human Whole Exome Sequencing and Simulated data
Manojkumar Kumaran, Umadevi Subramanian, Bharanidharan Devarajan·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2019
- Variant calling pipelines for whole exome sequencing in clinical context
Johanna Stepanian, Diego Saldaña, … Jorge Diaz·medRxiv·Oct 18, 2024
- CONVEX: Consensus Variant Pipeline for Exome Analysis
Ranjana Mariyam Raju, Ujjwal Prathap Singh, Prashanth Suravajhala·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2023
- Evaluating the analytical validity of mutation calling pipeline for tumor whole exome sequencing
Chinyi Cheng, Jia‐Hsin Huang, Jacob Shujui Hsu·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2022