The Effect of MR Image Quality on Structural and Functional Brain Connectivity: The Maastricht Study
Joost J.A. de JongiD, Jacobus F.A. JanseniD, Laura W. M. VergoosseniD, Miranda T. SchramiD, Coen D.A. StehouweriD, Joachim Ernst WildbergeriD, David E.J. LindeniD, Walter H. BackesiD
Abstract
In large population-based cohort studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to study the structure and function of the brain. Advanced MRI techniques such as diffusion-tensor (dMRI) or resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) can be used to study connections between distinct brain regions. However, brain connectivity measures are likely affected by biases introduced during MRI data acquisition and/or processing.\n\nWe identified three sources that may lead to bias, i.e. signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), head motion, and spatial mismatch between MRI-based anatomy and a brain atlas. After quantifying these sources, we determined the associations between the image quality metrics and brain connectivity measures derived from dMRI and rs-fMRI in 5,110 participants of the population-based Maastricht Study.\n\nMore head motion and low SNR were negatively associated with structural and functional brain connectivity, respectively, and these metrics substantially affected (>10%) associations of brain connectivity with age, sex and body mass index (BMI), whereas associations with diabetes status, educational level, history of cardiovascular disease, and white matter hyperintensities were less or not affected. In addition, age, sex, and BMI were associated with head motion, SNR, and atlas mismatch (all p < 0.001). Based on our results, we strongly advise that, in large population-based cohort neuroimaging studies, statistical analyses on structural and functional brain connectivity should adjust for potentially confounding effects of image quality.\n\nHighlightsO_LILow MR image quality compromises brain connectivity measures\nC_LIO_LIMR image quality is negatively associated with age, body mass index, and male sex\nC_LIO_LIStatistical analyses in large neuroimaging studies should account for image quality\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Typicality of Functional Connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs-fMRI across datasets, atlases and preprocessing pipelines
Jakub Kopál, Anna Pidnebesna, … Jaroslav Hlinka·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2020
- Variations in Structural MRI Quality Significantly Impact Commonly-Used Measures of Brain Anatomy
Alysha D. Gilmore, Nicholas J. Buser, Jamie Lars Hanson·Brain InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2021
- The Impact of In-Scanner Head Motion on Structural Connectivity Derived from Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Graham L. Baum, David R. Roalf, … Theodore Daniel Satterthwaite·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2017
- Restoring statistical validity in group analyses of motion-corrupted MRI data
Antoine Lutti, Nadège Corbin, … Giulia Di Domenicantonio·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2022
- The efficacy of different preprocessing steps in reducing motion-related confounds in diffusion MRI connectomics
Stuart Oldham, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, … Alex Fornito·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2020
- Data-driven Assessment of Structural Image Quality
Adon F.G. Rosen, David R. Roalf, … Theodore Daniel Satterthwaite·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 24, 2017