NON-LINEAR SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INTERFERENCES IN DECLARATIVE MEMORY FORMATION
D. Moyano Malen, Giulia Carbonari, Matías BonillaiD, E. Pedreira María, I. Brusco Luis, Laura KaczeriD, Cecilia ForcatoiD
Abstract
After encoding, memories go through a labile state followed by a stabilization process known as consolidation. Once consolidated they can enter a new labile state after the presentation of a reminder of the original memory, followed by a period of restabilization (reconsolidation). During these periods of lability the memory traces can be modified. Currently, there are studies that show a rapid stabilization after 30 min, while others show that stabilization occurs after longer periods (e.g. 6 h). Here we investigate the effect of an interference treatment on declarative memory consolidation, comparing distinct time intervals after acquisition. On day 1, participants learned a list of non-syllable pairs (List 1). Immediately after, 30 min, 3 h or 8 h later, they received an interference list (List 2) that acted as an amnesic agent. On day 2 (48 h after training) participants had to recall List 1 first, followed by List 2. We found that the List 1 memory was susceptible to interference when the List 2 was administered immediately or 3 h after learning; however, shortly after acquisition (e.g. 30 min) the List 1 memory becomes transiently protected against interference. We propose the possibility that this rapid memory protection could be induced by a fast and transient neocortical integration (where the memory is transiently protected) becoming partially independent from the hippocampus followed by a hippocampal re-engagement where the memory becomes susceptible to interferences again. Our results open a discussion about the contribution of molecular and systemic aspects to memory consolidation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Time-dependent mnemonic vulnerability induced by new-learning
Fengtao Shen, Xingxia Chen, … Sze Chai Kwok·Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2019
- The hippocampus and neocortical inhibitory engrams protect against memory interference
Renée S. Koolschijn, Uzay E. Emir, … Helen Catharine Barron·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2018
- Contextual Inference Drives Motor Memory Protection and Disruption
Sumit Sannamath, Rajneet Kaur, … Neeraj Kumar·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- REACTIVATION PROTECTS MOTOR MEMORIES FROM INTERFERENCE BY COMPETING LEARNING
T. Suresh, Adarsh M Kumar, Pratik K. Mutha·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2025
- Overnight memory consolidation facilitates rather than interferes with new learning of similar materials - a study probing NMDA-receptors
Marjan Alizadeh Asfestani, Elena Marie Braganza, … Gordon B. Feld·NeuropsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2018
- Learning Fast and Slow: Increased cortical plasticity leads to memory interference and enhanced hippocampal-cortical interactions
Irene Navarro‐Lobato, Adrian Aleman‐Zapata, … Lisa Genzel·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 5, 2023