Journal of NeurophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Menstrual cycle phase alters corticospinal excitability and spike-timing-dependent plasticity in healthy females
Pádraig SpillaneiD, Elisa PastorioiD, Elisa NédéleciD, Jessica PiaseckiiD, Stuart GoodalliD, Kirsty Marie HicksiD, Paul AnsdelliD
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Abstract
The known fluctuations in ovarian hormone concentrations across the eumenorrheic menstrual cycle contribute to modulations in cortical excitability and inhibition. However, how such changes affect spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) has not been systematically studied. This research aimed to determine the effect of the menstrual cycle on corticospinal excitability and STDP. Twelve eumenorrheic female participants (age: 25 {+/-} 5 years), visited the lab in three menstrual cycle phases: early follicular (EF), late follicular (LF), and mid-luteal (ML). Visits comprised of corticospinal excitability (motor evoked potential [MEP]/Mmax), short-intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) measures, recorded in the resting first dorsal interosseous. Followed by a paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocol, utilising ulnar nerve and transcranial magnetic stimulation (25 ms interstimulus interval) to elicit neuroplasticity. To assess the time course of STDP, measurements were repeated at 15 and 30-minutes post PAS. Corticospinal excitability (MEP/Mmax) was greater in the LF phase (p[≤]0.002) compared to EF and ML, with no phase effects observed for SICI or ICF (p[≥]0.112). PAS elicited an increase in MEP/Mmax across all phases at 15-minutes (112 {+/-} 5, 115 {+/-} 5, and 113 {+/-} 7% baseline, p[≤]0.010), whereas at 30-minutes only ML was facilitated (126 {+/-} 7% baseline, p=0.029). The present data demonstrates facilitatory STDP can be induced with PAS across the tested menstrual cycle phases, but responses are prolonged and potentiated in the ML phase. Additionally, increased corticospinal excitability in the LF phase is likely due to intrinsic changes within the descending tract, as no changes in intracortical neurotransmission were observed.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phase-specific stimulation reveals consistent sinusoidal modulation of human corticospinal excitability along the oscillatory beta cycle
Marius Keute, Julian-Samuel Gebühr, … Alireza Gharabaghi·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2023
- Estrus-Cycle Regulation of Cortical Inhibition
Ann M. Clemens, Constanze Lenschow, … Michael Brecht·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2019
- Not Just Noise: Aperiodic Brain Activity Reflects Corticospinal Excitability
Juliana Hougland, Miriam Kirchhoff, … Ulf Ziemann·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026
- State dependent motor cortex stimulation reveals distinct mechanisms for corticospinal excitability and cortical responses
Nipun D. Perera, Miles Wischnewski, … Alexander Opitz·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability
Miles Wischnewski, Zachary J. Haigh, … Alexander Opitz·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2022
- Cardiac activity impacts spinal cord excitability. A Call to Return to the Roots
Nikolay Syrov, Polina Morozova, … Alexander Kaplan·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2025