Separating three variability and noise sources in the response fluctuation of brain stimulation
Abstract
Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are among the few directly observable responses to suprathreshold brain stimulation and serve a variety of applications. If the MEP size is graphed over the stimulation strength, they form an input-output (IO), recruitment, or dose-response curve. Previous statistical models with two variability sources inherently consider the small MEPs at the low plateau as part of the neural recruitment properties. However, recent studies demonstrated that small MEP responses are contaminated and over-shadowed by background noise of mostly technical quality and suggested that the recruitment curve should continue below this noise level. This work intends to separate physiological variability from background noise and improve the description of recruitment behaviour. We developed a model with three variability sources and a logarithmic logistic function without a lower plateau. Compared to previous models, we incorporated an additional source for background noise from amplifiers, electrode impedance, and remote bioelectric activity, which form the obesrved low-side plateau. Compared to the dual-variability source modes, our approach better described IO characteristics, evidenced by lower Bayesian Information Criterion scores across all subjects and pulse shapes. The model independently extracted hidden variability information across the stimulated neural system and isolated it from background noise, which led to an accurate estimation of the IO curve parameters. This new model offers a robust tool to analyse brain stimulation IO curves in clinical and experimental neuroscience, reducing the risk of spurious results from inappropriate statistical methods. By providing a more accurate representation of MEP responses and variability sources, this approach advances our understanding of cortical excitability and may improve the assessment of neuromodulation effects.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Detection of Motor-Evoked Potentials Below the Noise Floor: Rethinking the Motor Threshold
Zhongxi Li, Angel V. Peterchev, … Stefan M. Goetz·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2021
- A user-friendly input-output (IO) curve analysis tool for variable brain stimulation responses, particularly evoked potentials in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Ke Ma, Stephan M. Goetz·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2024
- Statistical Model of Motor Evoked Potentials for Simulation of Transcranial Magnetic and Electric Stimulation
Stefan M. Goetz, S. M. Madhi Alavi, … Angel V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2018
- A personalized map of where, when, and how to stimulate the brain to elicit controlled responses
Giovanni Rabuffo, Irene Acero-Pousa, … Gustavo Deco·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2026
- Modeling motor-evoked potentials from neural field simulations of transcranial magnetic stimulation
M. T. Wilson, B. Moezzi, N. C. Rogasch·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2020
- Does pericentral mu-rhythm power corticomotor excitability? A matter of EEG perspective
Anke Ninija Karabanov, Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2021