Dissecting Phylogenetic Support: Unified Decay Indices, AU Tests, and Branch-Site Specific Visualizations.
James O. McInerneyiD, Christopher J. CreeveyiD, Mary J. O’ConnelliD
Abstract
Phylogenetic inference relies on robust measures of branch support to assess the reliability of evolutionary relationships. While bootstrap resampling and Bayesian probabilities have become the predominant support metrics in molecular phylogenetics, decay indices (also known as Bremer support) provide an alternative perspective by quantifying the amount of evidence required to collapse specific clades. We present panDecay, a unified software framework that extends the classical parsimony-based decay index concept to maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference approaches. panDecay automates the calculation of ML-based decay indices using log-likelihood differences, performs Approximately Unbiased (AU) statistical tests, and computes Bayesian decay indices through marginal likelihood comparisons using stepping-stone sampling. The software integrates with established phylogenetic tools (PAUP* and MrBayes) and provides comprehensive output including site-specific support analysis, multiple annotated tree formats, and detailed statistical reports. panDecay supports diverse data types (DNA, protein, and discrete morphological characters), offers flexible model specification, and provides parallel processing capabilities for computationally intensive Bayesian analyses. By unifying decay index calculations across parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian frameworks within a single command-line interface, panDecay enables researchers to obtain complementary support metrics that provide deeper insights into phylogenetic signal strength and distribution across sequence alignments. The software is implemented in Python 3.8+, distributed via PyPI, and released under the MIT license.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phylogenetic tree statistics: a systematic overview using the new R package 'treestats'
Thijs Janzen, Rampal S. Etienne·Molecular Phylogenetics and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2024
- DensiTree 2: Seeing Trees Through the Forest
Remco R. Bouckaert, Joseph Heled·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2014
- Quantifying and visualising divergence between pairs of phylogenetic trees: implications for phylogenetic reconstruction
M. R. Smith·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2017
- Robust Phylogenetics
Qin Liu, Bùi Quang Minh, … Barbara R. Holland·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2025
- FigTreeKit: A Python toolkit for programmatic FigTree styling, taxonomy-aware clade auditing, and phylogenetic tree rendering
Zichao Zeng, Yinzhao Wang·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Additional analytical support for a new method to compute the likelihood of diversification models
G. Laudanno, B. Haegeman, R. S. Etienne·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2019