henhaobio
Sign in

Brain stimulationNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Transcranial direct current stimulation elevates the baseline activity while sharpening the spatial tuning of the human visual cortex

Jeongyeol AhniD, Juhyoung RyuiD, Sangjun LeeiD, Chany LeeiD, Chang‐Hwan ImiD, Sang‐Hun LeeiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely used to affect various kinds of human cognition, behavioral studies on humans have produced highly inconsistent results. This requires a clear understanding of how tDCS impacts the system-level neural activity, a prerequisite for the principled application of tDCS to human cognition. ObjectiveHere, we aim to gain such understanding by probing the spatial and temporal cortical activity of the human early visual cortex (EVC) in diverse aspects while controlling the polarity and presence of tDCS. We target EVC to capitalize on its well-established anatomical and functional architecture that is readily accessible with non-invasive quantitative neuroimaging methods. MethodsTo create an electric field in EVC precisely and effectively, we tailored high-definition stimulation montages for 15 individual brains by running electric field simulations. We then conducted an fMRI (functional magnetic neuroimaging)-tDCS experiment on each brain with a sham-controlled crossover design over multiple days. We quantified tDCS effects with eight measures, tested their significance with mixed ANOVA, and further validated their robustness to across-voxel and across-subject variability. ResultsThe anodal application of tDCS gradually elevated EVCs baseline BOLD activity and sharpened its spatial tuning by augmenting surround suppression without affecting its evoked activity. ConclusionsComparisons of our and previous findings suggest the fundamental differences in tDCS effects between the visual and motor cortices, inhibitory and excitatory effects predominant in the former and latter, respectively. This calls for considering the differences in the excitatory-inhibitory recurrent network between brain regions in predicting or interpreting tDCS effects.

Citations
2
FWCI
0.21
Field percentile
49th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBogaard '19Sánchez-Leó '25Chen '24Caie '24Larcombe '19Vergallito '23
80% semantic matchNeuroscience
Andrew R. Bogaard, Guillaume Lajoie, H C Boyd+3 more·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2019· 16 citations