henhaobio
Sign in

Frontiers in NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of hMT+ Does Not Affect Motion Perception Learning

Stephanie Jade LarcombeiD, Christopher Kennard C, Jacinta O’SheaiD, Holly BridgeiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

BackgroundHuman visual cortical area hMT+, like its homologue MT in the macaque monkey, has been shown to be particularly selective to visual motion. After damage to the primary visual cortex (V1), patients often exhibit preserved ability to detect moving stimuli, which is associated with neural activity in area hMT+. As an anatomical substrate underlying residual function in the absence of V1, promoting functional plasticity in hMT+ could potentially boost visual performance despite cortical damage.\n\nObjectiveTo establish in healthy participants whether it is possible to use transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over hMT+ to potentiate learning of visual motion direction discrimination.\n\nMethodsParticipants were trained daily for five days on a visual motion direction discrimination task. Task difficulty was increased as performance improved, by decreasing the proportion of coherently moving dots, such that participants were always performing at psychophysical threshold. tDCS, either anodal or sham, was applied daily during the 20-minute training session. Task performance was assessed at baseline and at the end of the training period.\n\nResultsAll participants showed improved task performance both during and after training. Contrary to our hypothesis, anodal tDCS did not further improve performance compared to sham stimulation. Bayesian statistics indicated significant evidence in favour of the null hypothesis.\n\nConclusionAnodal tDCS to hMT+ does not enhance visual motion direction discrimination learning in the young healthy visual system.

Citations
14
FWCI
0.88
Field percentile
top 29%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWang '22Kerstens '26Hsu '22Meek '24Ahn '23Sasaki '26
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Ying Wang, Jixian Wang, Qingfang Zhang+6 more·Neuroscience Bulletin·Jul 30, 2022· 34 citations