Benchmarking Computational Integration Methods for Spatial Transcriptomics Data
Yijun LiiD, Stefan StanojeviciD, Bing HeiD, Zheng JingiD, Qianhui HuangiD, Jian KangiD, Lana X. GarmireiD
Abstract
The increasing popularity of spatial transcriptomics has allowed researchers to analyze transcriptome data in its tissue samples spatial context. Various methods have been developed for detecting SV (spatially variable) genes, with distinct spatial expression patterns. However, the accuracy of using these SV genes in clustering has not been thoroughly studied. On the other hand, in single cell resolution sequencing data without spatial context, clustering analysis is usually done on highly variable (HV) genes. Here we investigate if integrating SV genes and HV genes from spatial transcriptomics data can improve clustering performance beyond using SV genes alone. We examined three methods that detect SV genes, including Giotto, spatialDE, and SPARK, and evaluated six methods that integrate different features measured from the same samples including MOFA+, scVI, Seurat v4, CIMLR, SNF, and the straightforward concatenation approach. We applied these methods on 19 real datasets from three different spatial transcriptomics technologies (merFISH, SeqFISH+, and Visium) as well as 20 simulated datasets of varying spatial expression conditions. Our evaluations show that MOFA+ and simple concatenation have good performances in general, despite the variations among datasets and spatial transcriptomics platforms. This work shows that integrating highly variable and spatially variable genes in the spatial transcriptomics data can improve clustering beyond using spatially variable genes only. It also provides practical guides on the choices of computational methods to accomplish this goal.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating spatially variable gene detection methods for spatial transcriptomics data
Carissa Chen, Hani Jieun Kim, Pengyi Yang·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2024
- SPACE: Spatially variable gene clustering adjusting for cell type effect for improved spatial domain detection.
Sikta Das Adhikari, Nina G. Steele, … Yuehua Cui·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2025
- DESpace: spatially variable gene detection via differential expression testing of spatial clusters
Peiying Cai, Mark D. Robinson, Simone Tiberi·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2024
- STEAM: Spatial Transcriptomics Evaluation Algorithm and Metric for clustering performance
Samantha Reynoso, Courtney T. Schiebout, … Fan Zhang·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2025
- Spatial pattern and differential expression analysis with spatial transcriptomic data
Fei Qin, Xizhi Luo, … Guoshuai Cai·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 11, 2024
- STCC: consensus clustering enhances spatial domain detection for spatial transcriptomics data
Congcong Hu, Nana Wei, … Xiaoqi Zheng·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2024