Trading accuracy for speed over the course of a decision
Abstract
Humans and other animals often need to balance the desire to gather sensory information (to make the best choice) with the urgency to act, facing a speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT). Given the ubiquity of SAT across species, extensive research has been devoted to understanding the computational mechanisms allowing its regulation at different timescales, including from one context to another, and from one decision to another. However, animals must frequently change their SAT on even shorter timescales - i.e., over the course of an ongoing decision - and little is known about the mechanisms that allow such rapid adaptations. The present study aimed at addressing this issue. Human subjects performed a decision task with changing evidence. In this task, subjects received rewards for correct answers but incurred penalties for mistakes. An increase or a decrease in penalty occurring halfway through the trial promoted rapid SAT shifts, favoring speeded decisions either in the early or in the late stage of the trial. Importantly, these shifts were associated with stage-specific adjustments in the accuracy criterion exploited for committing to a choice. Those subjects who decreased the most their accuracy criterion at a given decision stage exhibited the highest gain in speed, but also the highest cost in terms of performance accuracy at that time. Altogether, the current findings offer a unique extension of previous work, by suggesting that dynamic changes in accuracy criterion allow the regulation of the SAT within the timescale of a single decision. New and noteworthyExtensive research has been devoted to understanding the mechanisms allowing the regulation of the speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) from one context to another and from one decision to another. Here, we show that humans can voluntarily change their SAT on even shorter timescales - i.e., over the course of a decision. These rapid SAT shifts are associated with dynamic adjustments in the accuracy criterion exploited for committing to a choice.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The speed-accuracy tradeoff reveals flexible access to accumulating sensory evidence during human decision making
Stephanie Nelli, Sirawaj Itthipuripat, … John T. Serences·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2018
- Impact of decision and action outcomes on subsequent decision and action behaviors
Clara Saleri, David Thura, Amélie J. Reynaud·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2022
- Neural mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff of visual search: Saccade vigor, targeting errors, superior colliculus and frontal eye field
Thomas R. Reppert, Mathieu Servant, … Jeffrey D. Schall·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2018
- Neural Mechanisms for Executive Control of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff
Thomas R. Reppert, Richard P. Heitz, Jeffrey D. Schall·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2019
- Confidence predicts speed-accuracy tradeoff for subsequent decisions
Kobe Desender, Annika Boldt, … Tobias H. Donner·eLifePeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2019
- Hasty sensorimotor decisions rely on an overlap of broad and selective changes in motor activity
Gérard Derosière, David Thura, … Julie Duqué·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2022