bioRxivZoology
Low support values and lack of reproducibility of molecular phylogenetic analysis of Copepoda orders
Abstract
Reanalysis of the dataset used by Khodami et al. (2017) reveals low support values for the key nodes of the copepod (Crustacea) phylogeny and fails to reproduce the results obtained in the study. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian analyses with the dataset produce phylogenies that are inconsistent with the branching of copepod groups proposed by Khodami et al. (2017). The proposed phylogeny is refuted by the approximately unbiased (AU) statistical test, which undermines several conclusions drawn from the original study.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Impact of Species Tree Estimation Error on Cophylogenetic Reconstruction
Julia Zheng, Yuya Nishida, … Kevin J. Liu·IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2025
- Biological Systematic of the genus Notodiaptomus Kiefer 1936 (Copepoda: Calanoida)
Luís José de Oliveira Geraldes-Primeiro, Mauro José Cavalcanti, Edinaldo Nelson dos Santos‐Silva·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2024
- Feature Frequency Profile-based phylogenies are inaccurate
Y. Li, K. T. David, … A. Rokas·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2020
- The unresolved phylogenomic tree of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera): assessing the potential causes and consequences
J. Rota, V. G. Twort, … N. Wahlberg·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2021
- A phylogeny of extant coleoid cephalopods with brain data
Kiran Basava, Theiss Bendixen, … Michael Muthukrishna·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2024
- Exploring phylogenomic relationships within Myriapoda: should high matrix occupancy be the goal?
Rosa Fernandez, Gregory D Edgecombe, Gonzalo Giribet·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 9, 2016